Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Tutor] Document migration from native installation #78

Closed
arbrandes opened this issue Jun 3, 2021 · 9 comments
Closed

[Tutor] Document migration from native installation #78

arbrandes opened this issue Jun 3, 2021 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Relates to documentation improvements
Milestone

Comments

@arbrandes
Copy link
Contributor

As described in Criterion 6 of OEP-45, ADR-1, the community needs a documented way to migrate from the now deprecated native installation into a Tutor-deployed one.

Given the current timeframe, this documentation should target a migration from edx/configuration@lilac.X to tutor@maple.1.

@regisb
Copy link
Contributor

regisb commented Jun 7, 2021

One Tutor user already made a lot of research on this particular topic: https://discuss.overhang.io/t/migrating-from-native-install-to-tutor-juniper-tutor-10-x/1533

@BbrSofiane BbrSofiane self-assigned this Aug 2, 2021
@regisb
Copy link
Contributor

regisb commented Nov 25, 2021

@BbrSofiane did you make progress on this?

@BbrSofiane
Copy link
Member

@regisb I have a set of notes that I need to clean up and write somewhere. This shouldn't take me more than a couple of hours.

@regisb
Copy link
Contributor

regisb commented Nov 29, 2021

This shouldn't take me more than a couple of hours.

Famous last words

😉 No but seriously, I'm glad that you tackled this.

@BbrSofiane
Copy link
Member

Famous last words

Indeed 😂

@NeOneSoft
Copy link

Hello @BbrSofiane, do you consider that we need to document more details about this process?Thank you so much

@BbrSofiane
Copy link
Member

@NeOneSoft I think the document provides a good starting point. Going forward it can be improved based on feedback from people using it. I'm happy to close the issue unless there are additional comments,

@NeOneSoft
Copy link

@BbrSofiane thank you so much for you response!!. If you are agree and there's no additional comments you can go ahead. Thanks again!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Relates to documentation improvements
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants