-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Wrong blockchain data #2361
Comments
Another example: web3.eth.getTransactionReceipt("0x6cf7d00b5776a12f761274cd3810ab6d94bc9f0920f8419871d74fb16b95d8f2")
|
Which version of parity are you using? we recently fixed issue which could cause similar symptoms |
I tried latest beta and version 1.3.1, both show the same symptoms. |
There are two pending PRs fixing the issue(s):
|
Ok, thx, will the PRs be backported to beta as well? |
Yes, we are planning to release 1.3.2. shortly and those will be part of that release. |
ok, perfect, I will re-test once the pr's are merged |
Released in 1.3.2, also part of master branch. |
In light of the recent spam attack I am seeing again tx getting lost in limbo with the same behavior described above. All on the latest parity master. |
Can you try increasing the transaction queue size |
My fully synced parity node (latest beta branch) returns an invalid block & tx combo:
web3.eth.getTransactionReceipt("0x963021948f4df6980edb20dd559f5ce472d797aa8ff27214f5e6e32aeadf9fc9")
{ blockHash: '0x2bc9d7cef8ae9b4b175fec5c7f91237ba1b8d17e9eb8f886b15b6d04c1c6c4bb',
blockNumber: 2331557,
contractAddress: null,
cumulativeGasUsed: 839890,
gasUsed: 21000,
logs: [],
transactionHash: '0x963021948f4df6980edb20dd559f5ce472d797aa8ff27214f5e6e32aeadf9fc9',
transactionIndex: 30 }
Also we are observing lots of tx that go missing and are not mined at all. Please advice how to proceed as this failures makes it impossible to use parity to send transactions in a reliable way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: