Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 6, 2020. It is now read-only.

Make it possible to control logging in parity-clib #8574

Closed
tomaka opened this issue May 9, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Make it possible to control logging in parity-clib #8574

tomaka opened this issue May 9, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
F8-enhancement 🎊 An additional feature request. M4-core ⛓ Core client code / Rust. P7-nicetohave 🐕 Issue is worth doing eventually.
Milestone

Comments

@tomaka
Copy link
Contributor

tomaka commented May 9, 2018

Right now the logs are always printed on stdout with no way of retrieving them or filtering them.

@tomaka tomaka added P7-nicetohave 🐕 Issue is worth doing eventually. M4-core ⛓ Core client code / Rust. labels May 9, 2018
@tomaka tomaka added the F8-enhancement 🎊 An additional feature request. label May 9, 2018
@tomaka
Copy link
Contributor Author

tomaka commented May 14, 2018

This is complicated because of the parity_devLogs RPC query which requires returning the logs.

@tomaka
Copy link
Contributor Author

tomaka commented May 16, 2018

Also there's a "conflict" with the CLI options that allow controlling the mode, color and file of the logging.

@5chdn 5chdn added this to the 1.13 milestone Jun 13, 2018
@5chdn 5chdn modified the milestones: 2.1, 2.2 Jul 17, 2018
@5chdn 5chdn added this to the 2.3 milestone Sep 27, 2018
@5chdn 5chdn modified the milestones: 2.3, 2.4 Oct 29, 2018
@seunlanlege
Copy link
Member

this should be closed with #10007

@5chdn 5chdn modified the milestones: 2.4, 2.5 Jan 10, 2019
@5chdn 5chdn modified the milestones: 2.5, 2.6 Feb 21, 2019
@soc1c soc1c modified the milestones: 2.6, 2.7 Apr 2, 2019
@adria0
Copy link

adria0 commented Jul 27, 2020

Closing issue due to its stale state.

@adria0 adria0 closed this as completed Jul 27, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
F8-enhancement 🎊 An additional feature request. M4-core ⛓ Core client code / Rust. P7-nicetohave 🐕 Issue is worth doing eventually.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants
@tomaka @adria0 @5chdn @seunlanlege @soc1c and others