Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quality facets - find petfood in Open Food Facts #1026

Closed
Tracked by #10271
teolemon opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 0 comments · Fixed by #9340
Closed
Tracked by #10271

Quality facets - find petfood in Open Food Facts #1026

teolemon opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 0 comments · Fixed by #9340
Assignees
Labels
🧽 Data quality - Measure - Quality facets One of the facets available in Open Food Facts is /quality & allows us to spot products w/ bad data 🧽 Data quality https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/Quality help wanted

Comments

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 3, 2018

What

Look for common petfood keywords:
brands: pedigree pal, whiskas…

Part of

@teolemon teolemon added the 🧽 Data quality https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/Quality label Jan 3, 2018
@teolemon teolemon changed the title Create quality rule for petfood Create quality rule to find petfood in Open Food Facts Feb 10, 2018
@stephanegigandet stephanegigandet added the 🧽 Data quality - Measure - Quality facets One of the facets available in Open Food Facts is /quality & allows us to spot products w/ bad data label Jun 17, 2019
@teolemon teolemon changed the title Create quality rule to find petfood in Open Food Facts Quality facets - find petfood in Open Food Facts Oct 11, 2021
@benbenben2 benbenben2 self-assigned this Nov 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🧽 Data quality - Measure - Quality facets One of the facets available in Open Food Facts is /quality & allows us to spot products w/ bad data 🧽 Data quality https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/Quality help wanted
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants