Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add taxonomy entries for quality #7189

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2022
Merged

Conversation

teolemon
Copy link
Member

@teolemon teolemon commented Aug 9, 2022

What

  • Add taxonomy entries for quality

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 🧬 Taxonomies https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/Global_taxonomies label Aug 9, 2022
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Aug 9, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@teolemon teolemon changed the title Add taxonomy entries for quality feat: Add taxonomy entries for quality Aug 16, 2022
@teolemon teolemon added the 🧽 Data quality https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/Quality label Aug 16, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@stephanegigandet stephanegigandet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thank you

@stephanegigandet stephanegigandet merged commit 8f9caf9 into main Aug 16, 2022
@stephanegigandet stephanegigandet deleted the taxonomy-for-quality branch August 16, 2022 12:46
LandonPattison pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🧽 Data quality https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/Quality 🧬 Taxonomies https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/Global_taxonomies
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants