Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: illegal division by zero in percent estimation #8783

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2023
Merged

fix: illegal division by zero in percent estimation #8783

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2023

Conversation

stephanegigandet
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #8782

@stephanegigandet stephanegigandet requested a review from a team as a code owner August 1, 2023 13:58
@github-actions github-actions bot added 🥗 Ingredients 🧪 tests 🥗🔍 Ingredients analysis https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/Ingredients_Extraction_and_Analysis labels Aug 1, 2023
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Aug 1, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@stephanegigandet stephanegigandet merged commit 799f250 into main Aug 7, 2023
@stephanegigandet stephanegigandet deleted the fix-0-percent branch August 7, 2023 12:50
@openfoodfacts-bot openfoodfacts-bot mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@teolemon teolemon teolemon approved these changes

Assignees

@stephanegigandet stephanegigandet

Labels
🥗🔍 Ingredients analysis https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/Ingredients_Extraction_and_Analysis 🥗 Ingredients 🧪 tests
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Illegal division by zero at ProductOpener/Ingredients.pm - init_percent_values
2 participants
@stephanegigandet @teolemon