Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to use apothecary with addons? #117

Open
michaelbaisch opened this issue Jul 12, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

How to use apothecary with addons? #117

michaelbaisch opened this issue Jul 12, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@michaelbaisch
Copy link

Hi everyone,

especially since of_v0.10.0 I've been asking myself how apothecary is intended to be used with addons. Even in earlier versions it was a bit cumbersome to tell the users of an addons how to create the libs with apothecary. But with v0.10.0 apothecary isn't even included in the downloadable Of release.

In the readme of my addons I'm telling users to do this:

cd of_v0.10.0_osx_release/scripts/
git clone https://github.com/openframeworks/apothecary
cd apothecary/apothecary
./apothecary update ofxMyAddon

Is this intended this way, or did I understand something wrong?

Thanks,
Michael

@Daandelange
Copy link
Member

Almost identical, I use to do cd apothecary/ && ./apothecary/apothecary update ofxMyAddon instead of your last 2 lines and it seems to work for building. But then when copying they end up in the wrong place, so maybe we need to remove one apothecary folder level ? ./apothecary/apothecary copy ofxMyAddon

@dimitre
Copy link
Member

dimitre commented Feb 10, 2023

I noticed this a while ago and submitted a PR here https://github.com/openframeworks/apothecary/pull/213/files
But maybe it is more complex than this. I'm not sure if apothecary is meant to overwrite libs, or install assimp in addons folder for example.

@danoli3 danoli3 self-assigned this Feb 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants