Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 3, 2023. It is now read-only.

Web of Data #92

Open
percivall opened this issue Aug 29, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Web of Data #92

percivall opened this issue Aug 29, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@percivall
Copy link
Collaborator

This issue is for discussion about the "Web of Data" Trend.

@percivall
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@prushforth
Copy link

Great webinar this morning, George, Gobe, Ingo and team. I am putting this comment here in response to your request for input. Let's start the conversation at least.

Not quite sure under which Trend heading Map Markup Language, should be placed, but based on the discussion with the SDWIG in August (discussion starts at 21:59), I think it's worth discussing, at least in terms of what MapML is trying to achieve: integration of spatial data with Web browsers based on the cumulative best practices of our community. We in the Maps for HTML Community Group hope that, and are working towards the notion that MapML will be a joint standards project of the geospatial and Web communities. Indeed, neither MapML nor anything else in the target environment can succeed without such a collaboration.

Perhaps the trend itself could be identified not as MapML but instead as "map/feature awareness built into browsers and crawlers" (or something similar/pithier). The difference between this and the Geolocation API, for instance, is that the latter enables the browser to know where it is, whereas MapML implementation will allow the browser to know where other stuff is. As a result, the browser, or JavaScript extensions of it, could do useful things e.g. accessibility and geofencing come to mind.

MapML could be held out as an example of this trend. Perhaps it warrants a sibling row to this trend within the "Spatial Data on the Web" megatrend.

@prushforth
Copy link

Ping

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants