-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Collections - Sorenson #122
Comments
Since "Collections" and "Collection" need to stand for very different resources in different API's, OGC API Common really has the choice of either not mandating this as part of Common (at least of a Core" or accepting that it must be used as a meaning-free placeholder. |
OGC Common-Collections has been moved into a separate standard. The resources returned by the /collections and /collections/{collectionId} requests have been re-named to be more descriptive of the resource. |
This has been clarified in #140. Do we need to do anything else here? I'd say just close. |
Matt Sorenson:
a. Given the constant churn in multiple hackathons, testbeds, and pilots, the use of collections seems confused and incomplete. While the document as written is clear, the in-progress implementations show that additional work to clarify and/or apply them is needed. This is especially true where multiple resources are involved (see specifically Testbed 15 OPF, Vector Tile Pilot, 3D Container Pilot)
b. The list of collection types needs clarification based on in-progress implementations. Are Maps and Tiles spatial resources? How do you handle mixed collections (imagery tiles, vector tiles). If people trying to work with it are having problems, it needs to be revisited.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: