-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move partitioning conformance classes to Part 1 & add subset
query parameter
#76
Labels
Comments
We accepted this proposal in the OGC MM 120. |
WE should implement this in the document structure in github. |
There are some API Modules at API-Common that you may find useful. Look under the API_Modules directory. |
jerstlouis
changed the title
Move partinioning conformance classes to Part 1 & add
Move partitioning conformance classes to Part 1 & add Sep 16, 2021
subset
query parametersubset
query parameter
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Suggesting that:
be separate conformance classes, but all defined in Part 1 (they are currently in https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogcapi-maps/tree/master/extensions/partitioning/standard).
This would reflect the fact that
bbox
is a basic capability that most implementations will want to implement, yet allow implementers to achieve conformance with Core, and only implement the partitioning mechanisms that they care to support initially.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: