Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[smaenergymeter] binding unplausible values #12142

Closed
drego83 opened this issue Jan 27, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

[smaenergymeter] binding unplausible values #12142

drego83 opened this issue Jan 27, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels
bug An unexpected problem or unintended behavior of an add-on duplicate

Comments

@drego83
Copy link

drego83 commented Jan 27, 2022

hey,
i tested with smaenergymeter 3.2.0 and 3.3.0 as version.
I get every 30 seconds unplausible values like:
-2210282340352
-789146370048
and others ...
mostly alternating with the correct value.
This error causes on all channels by the binding ...

anything an idea?
@drego83 drego83 added the bug An unexpected problem or unintended behavior of an add-on label Jan 27, 2022
@drego83 drego83 changed the title smaenergymeter unplausible values binding smaenergymeter unplausible values Jan 27, 2022
@drego83 drego83 changed the title binding smaenergymeter unplausible values [smaenergymeter] binding unplausible values Jan 27, 2022
@DollC
Copy link

DollC commented Jan 30, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Same problem since a few days.
Got an update of HomeManager

Firmware-Version des Hauptprozessors | 2.08.5.R | 24.01.2022 23:05:40
Firmware-Version des Betriebssystems | 3.13.0.R | 24.01.2022 23:05:40

@DollC
Copy link

DollC commented Mar 9, 2022

Maybe this gives a hint how to solve the problem ? http://www.eb-systeme.de/?page_id=3005

@DollC
Copy link

DollC commented Mar 9, 2022

@kaikreuzer, @Hilbrand , @marcelrv or @wborn I just checked the code and see that you contributed something to this binding. Maybe you can help us solving the problem? Thanks!

@wborn
Copy link
Member

wborn commented Mar 10, 2022

Isn't this the same issue as #11497?

@DollC
Copy link

DollC commented Mar 10, 2022

Yes. It looks like it is the same

@wborn
Copy link
Member

wborn commented Mar 10, 2022

OK let's close this issue then. I can't really help as I do not use that binding myself.

@wborn wborn closed this as completed Mar 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug An unexpected problem or unintended behavior of an add-on duplicate
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@wborn @DollC @drego83