[PRE REVIEW]: SlicerITKUltrasound: A 3D Slicer extension for ultrasound image formation, processing, and analysis #144
Comments
|
Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type: |
|
@arokem - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS? |
|
@whedon assign @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman as editor |
|
OK, the editor is @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman |
|
@thewtex I've started to chase down potential reviewers. Let me know if want to suggest any reviewers. |
|
@jcfr @aylward if you are not involved in this project, are you able to review (or suggest reviewers for) this submission for http://joss.theoj.org/? |
|
@ungi @lassoan if you are not involved in this project, are you able to review (or suggest reviewers for) this submission for http://joss.theoj.org/? |
|
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman thanks for your help. @ungi @lassoan or @fedorov may be good reviewers. |
|
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman can you please point me to your reviewer guidelines? I could not quickly locate them on http://joss.theoj.org/. |
|
I would be happy to review, but not sure what or how. I only see a repository with some code and doc. Is there a rendered document somewhere? Should I review and/or test the code? |
|
@fedorov @lassoan the reviewer guidelines are found here http://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines The review process focuses largely on the claims about the software and the software itself. The paper is a very short document since our view is that properly documented software forms the more important part of the software publication. A paper PDF is generated based on the paper.md file which for this project is found here: The paper text is also rendered here: This is an example of an accepted paper: You can view the review process that occurred for that paper here: As you can see, once a reviewer is assigned a check list appears which forms the basis of the review process. Let me know if you have any other questions. Kevin |
|
OK, the reviewer is @lassoan |
|
it's super confusing that I receive github comments by email that do not show up in this issue
|
|
The submission fulfills the JOSS requirements. My only concern is that the software's scope (as described in the title) is "ultrasound image formation, processing, and analysis", but now it only addresses a small task in ultrasound image formation (scan conversion). Many more modules will be needed to make the software fulfill its promise. |
|
@fedorov Apologies. I was having some trouble with our system and deleted those messages to avoid clogging this thread. |
|
@whedon start review magic-word=bananas |
|
OK, I've started the review over in #153. Feel free to close this issue now! |
|
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman - #153 is the main review issue so we should move the conversation over there. |
Submitting author: @thewtex (Matthew McCormick)
Repository: https://github.com/KitwareMedical/SlicerITKUltrasound
Version: v0.2.0
Editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Reviewer: @lassoan
What this issue is for
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @thewtex. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: