[PRE REVIEW]: osfr: An R Interface to the Open Science Framework

[whedon]

Submitting author: @aaronwolen (Aaron R Wolen)
Repository: https://github.com/ropensci/osfr
Version: v0.2.7
Editor: @kthyng
Reviewers: @kthyng

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @aaronwolen. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@aaronwolen if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.10 s (772.0 files/s, 55134.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               60            636           1248           2323
Markdown                         6            118              0            375
YAML                             4             27              3            110
TeX                              1              8              0             83
Rmd                              3            112            191             51
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            74            901           1442           2942
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '2036' was gathered on 2020/01/22.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003285 is OK
- 10.1002/cpet.32 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005510 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0473-8-7 may be missing for title: Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[labarba]

👋 @trallard — Could you handle this JOSS submission as editor? Let us know! Thx.

[aaronwolen]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository

[aaronwolen]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[aaronwolen]

Thanks, @whedon. You rock.

This package has been reviewed by rOpenSci: ropensci/software-review#279, @ropensci/editors

[trallard]

Sure assign this to me! I'll be happy to edit

[labarba]

@whedon assign @trallard as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @trallard

[aaronwolen]

A few potential reviewers from the list that might be a good fit:

• benmarwick
• milesmcbain
• clauswilke

[trallard]

Hi all I am the editor for this submission, we are looking for at least 2 reviewers.

@benmarwick, Ben are you willing and able to review this submission?
@MilesMcBain, Miles are you willing and able to review this submission?
@clauswilke, Claus are you willing and able to review this submission?

[clauswilke]

Sorry, no, I'm super busy the next few weeks and can't take this on at this time.

[maelle]

This package has been reviewed by rOpenSci over at ropensci/software-review#279 so doesn't need any review? @trallard

[ooo]

👋 Hey @maelle...

Letting you know, @trallard is currently OOO until Monday, February 10th 2020. ❤️

[kthyng]

This package has been reviewed by rOpenSci over at ropensci/software-review#279 so doesn't need any review? @trallard

Hi @maelle! Ah, we must have missed that sorry. Just to verify: this submission has already been reviewed and accepted by rOpenSci?

[ooo]

👋 Hey @kthyng...

Letting you know, @trallard is currently OOO until Monday, February 10th 2020. ❤️

[maelle]

Yes, it has been reviewed and accepted by rOpenSci indeed.

[kthyng]

@whedon assign @kthyng as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @kthyng

[kthyng]

@whedon assign @kthyng as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @kthyng is now a reviewer

[kthyng]

Another link to the rOpenSci review.

[kthyng]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #2071.

[MilesMcBain]

Hi @trallard, Sorry I'm not familiar with this osf.io framework and do not have the bandwidth to immerse myself in it for a review at the moment.

There are some active R/rOpensci community members I know of in the communities listed here: https://osf.io/be7yt/wiki/home/ I am sure you could find someone suitable without much digging, e.g.: https://morn.netlify.com/about/

[ooo]

👋 Hey @MilesMcBain...

Letting you know, @trallard is currently OOO until Monday, February 10th 2020. ❤️

[kthyng]

@MilesMcBain and @benmarwick sorry for the confusion — this has already been reviewed through rOpenSci so no reviewers needed here. Thanks!