[PRE REVIEW]: c-lasso: a Python package for constrained sparse regression and classification

[whedon]

Submitting author: @Leo-Simpson (Leo Simpson)
Repository: https://github.com/Leo-Simpson/c-lasso
Version: v1.0
Editor: @mjsottile
Reviewers: @jbytecode, @glemaitre
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Leo-Simpson. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Leo-Simpson if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1093/biomet/71.2.323 is OK
- 10.1101/2020.09.01.277632 is OK
- 10.1007/s10957-018-1430-2 is OK
- 10.1007/s11228-011-0191-y is OK
- 10.1214/19-EJS1662 is OK
- 10.1007/s12561-020-09283-2 is OK
- 10.1080/10618600.2018.1473777 is OK
- 10.1080/01621459.2019.1609970 is OK
- 10.1162/NECO_a_00434 is OK
- 10.1093/biomet/asu031 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00740.x is OK
- 10.1214/009053606000001370 is OK
- 10.1214/16-AOAS928 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/bf02985802 may be a valid DOI for title: The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2020.106958 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=8.15 s (5.3 files/s, 12124.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                             3           6745              6          41729
SQL                              1              0              0          37299
Python                          19            893            820           3443
Markdown                         6            499              3           1113
Jupyter Notebook                 3              0           5152            520
TeX                              1             21              1            209
R                                3             35             32             76
reStructuredText                 5             52             64             37
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            43           8257           6086          84461
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '74dbc8b66f808cbec11046e3' was
gathered on 2020/11/02.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Leo-Simpson                    166         19112          13956          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Leo-Simpson                5156           27.0          2.4                7.06

[whedon]

Failed to discover a valid open source license.

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[Leo-Simpson]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository

[Leo-Simpson]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[Leo-Simpson]

@whedon check references

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1093/biomet/71.2.323 is OK
- 10.1101/2020.09.01.277632 is OK
- 10.1007/s10957-018-1430-2 is OK
- 10.1007/s11228-011-0191-y is OK
- 10.1214/19-EJS1662 is OK
- 10.1007/s12561-020-09283-2 is OK
- 10.1080/10618600.2018.1473777 is OK
- 10.1080/01621459.2019.1609970 is OK
- 10.1007/bf02985802 is OK
- 10.1016/j.csda.2020.106958 is OK
- 10.1162/NECO_a_00434 is OK
- 10.1093/biomet/asu031 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00740.x is OK
- 10.1214/009053606000001370 is OK
- 10.1214/16-AOAS928 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@pdebuyl @melissawm @drvinceknight could one of you edit this submission?

[pdebuyl]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman I just picked pysensors. If nobody takes this next week I can do it as well.

[arfon]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman - let's give this one to @mjsottile who is available to edit again.

[arfon]

@whedon assign @mjsottile as editor

👋 @mjsottile - can you take this one for us?

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @mjsottile

[mjsottile]

Sounds good. @Leo-Simpson : please let me know if you have any suggested reviewers for your submission. Otherwise I will start to identify a few people to ask.

[Leo-Simpson]

Thank you @mjsottile . I don't have specific suggestion for reviewers, but for example I saw that jbytecode have computational statistics and optimization on his domain area so I think it could fit.

[mjsottile]

👋 Hello @jbytecode, @zhampel, @nhejazi : Would you be interested in providing a review for this submission to JOSS? I have identified you based on your areas of knowledge as listed in our potential reviewer spreadsheet. Please let me know if you are interested and available. Thank you!

[zhampel]

@mjsottile I will be out of office for the next two weeks and can not take on the review at the moment. Cheers

[jbytecode]

Dear editor @mjsottile , I gladly accept reviewing this paper, thank you.

[nhejazi]

Thanks, @mjsottile -- unfortunately, I am already committed to several other ongoing reviews and do not have the bandwidth to accept another at the moment.

[mjsottile]

@whedon add @jbytecode as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @jbytecode is now a reviewer

[mjsottile]

👋 @oesteban, @tupi, @glemaitre : Would you be interested in providing a review for this submission to JOSS? I have identified you based on your areas of knowledge as listed in our potential reviewer spreadsheet. Please let me know if you are interested and available. Thank you!

[glemaitre]

@mjsottile I can help with the review.

[mjsottile]

@whedon add @glemaitre as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @glemaitre is now a reviewer

[mjsottile]

Thanks @glemaitre and @jbytecode for agreeing to help - it looks like we're good to start the review. Please let me know if you have any questions over in the review thread.

[mjsottile]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #2844.

[Leo-Simpson]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[Leo-Simpson]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[Leo-Simpson]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈