[PRE REVIEW]: beamshapes: a Python package to generate directivity patterns for various sound source models #3590

whedon · 2021-08-09T08:43:53Z

Submitting author: @thejasvibr (Beleyur Thejasvi)
Repository: https://github.com/thejasvibr/bat_beamshapes.git
Version: v0.2.0
Editor: @faroit
Reviewers: @nils-werner, @hagenw
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/820fd37f8255a8c533d6cc4c9475ecb5"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/820fd37f8255a8c533d6cc4c9475ecb5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/820fd37f8255a8c533d6cc4c9475ecb5/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/820fd37f8255a8c533d6cc4c9475ecb5)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @thejasvibr. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@thejasvibr if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

whedon · 2021-08-09T08:43:56Z

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

whedon · 2021-08-09T08:44:02Z

Wordcount for paper.md is 1075

whedon · 2021-08-09T08:44:04Z

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.18 s (330.5 files/s, 223081.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                             2           3522              4          25979
Python                          32            969           1913           2056
TeX                              2             51             21            438
Jupyter Notebook                 5              0           4112            403
reStructuredText                10            218            165            231
Markdown                         5             92              0            191
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
YAML                             1              3              0              9
make                             1              4              7              9
Rmd                              1             22             47              0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            60           4889           6270          29342
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '93412b0adb1201981142ff45' was
gathered on 2021/08/09.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
tbeleyur                        12          1141            135           10.99
thejasvi                        75          7135           3167           88.72
thejasvibr                       1            32              2            0.29

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
tbeleyur                    259           22.7          8.2                6.95
thejasvi                   4679           65.6          2.4               19.90

whedon · 2021-08-09T08:44:23Z

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/c2017-0-01630-0 may be a valid DOI for title: Acoustics: Sound Fields, Transducers and Vibration
- 10.1121/1.1912304 may be a valid DOI for title: Acoustical beam patterns for bats: some theoretical considerations
- 10.1007/bf00610475 may be a valid DOI for title: Sound radiation patterns in the frequency domain of cries from a Vespertilionid bat
- 10.1098/rspb.2008.1505 may be a valid DOI for title: Echolocating bats emit a highly directional sonar sound beam in the field
- 10.1121/10.0001376 may be a valid DOI for title: High resolution three-dimensional beam radiation pattern of harbour porpoise clicks with implications for passive acoustic monitoring
- 10.1038/nature11664 may be a valid DOI for title: Convergent acoustic field of view in echolocating bats
- 10.1073/pnas.1422843112 may be a valid DOI for title: Bats adjust their mouth gape to zoom their biosonar field of view
- 10.1121/1.3519408 may be a valid DOI for title: A method for estimating the orientation of a directional sound source from source directivity and multi-microphone recordings: Principles and application
- 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103996 may be a valid DOI for title: Sound radiation pattern of the advertisement call of the highly territorial poison frog Allobates femoralis
- 10.1007/bf00657481 may be a valid DOI for title: Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.005 may be a valid DOI for title: Acoustic directionality of red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) song relates to amplitude and singing behaviours
- 10.2307/1367730 may be a valid DOI for title: The importance of directional sound radiation in avian vocalization
- 10.1098/rspb.2009.1519 may be a valid DOI for title: Birds adjust acoustic directionality to beam their antipredator calls to predators and conspecifics
- 10.2307/3676376 may be a valid DOI for title: Directionality of blackbird vocalization. Implications for vocal communication and its further study
- 10.1007/s00265-006-0343-5 may be a valid DOI for title: Differences in acoustic directionality among vocalizations of the male red-winged blackbird (Agelaius pheoniceus) are related to function in communication
- 10.1046/j.1439-0361.2002.02045.x may be a valid DOI for title: Sound radiation patterns in nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) songs

INVALID DOIs

- None

whedon · 2021-08-09T08:44:23Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

arfon · 2021-08-09T08:48:21Z

@thejasvibr - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

If you want to fix the DOIs while you're waiting (noting that Whedon's suggestions are not always right), you can, then use the following commands (one at a time, as the first line of a new comment) to regenerate the PDF and check the references.

@whedon generate pdf
@whedon check references

faroit · 2021-08-10T18:58:43Z

@arfon I think is relatively close to my areas of expertise so I can edit this submission

arfon · 2021-08-12T05:07:04Z

@whedon assign @faroit as editor

whedon · 2021-08-12T05:07:08Z

OK, the editor is @faroit

arfon · 2021-08-12T05:07:15Z

Thanks @faroit!

thejasvibr · 2021-08-12T10:55:29Z

@whedon commands

whedon · 2021-08-12T10:55:31Z

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository

thejasvibr · 2021-08-12T11:05:12Z

@whedon suggested reviewers are DrMarc, pharshalp, astanziola

whedon · 2021-08-12T11:05:15Z

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands

thejasvibr · 2021-08-12T11:08:13Z

Thanks for agreeing to edit @faroit. Suggested reviewers from my side are DrMarc, pharshalp, astanziola

faroit · 2021-09-06T20:53:34Z

Hi @thejasvibr, sorry for the long waiting time. I wanted to make sure that I have enough bandwidth to probably maintain the editing process before kicking this off.

Thanks for agreeing to edit @faroit. Suggested reviewers from my side are DrMarc, pharshalp, astanziola

I think that sounds good, I would also like to include an audio researcher who isn't that much familiar with animal sounds but general dsp and python: I would like to ask nils-werner if there is not conflict of interest.

In the meantime, I suggest you can already work on the missing DOI as pointed out by @arfon

thejasvibr · 2021-09-08T10:05:29Z

Hi @faroit,
Thanks for getting back - no worries at all. No objections to nils-werner, don't see a conflict of interest and would be great to have someone who's not from the same field as reviewer.

Will start working on the missing DOIs!

faroit · 2021-09-08T10:21:22Z

👋 @nils-werner @DrMarc @astanziola @hagenw @mgeier - would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The software under review is beamshapes: a Python package to generate directivity patterns for various sound source models.

This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place.

nils-werner · 2021-09-09T08:53:30Z

Yes, I would be willing to review it.

faroit · 2021-09-09T09:05:36Z

@whedon add @nils-werner as reviewer

whedon · 2021-09-09T09:05:40Z

OK, @nils-werner is now a reviewer

hagenw · 2021-09-14T13:41:23Z

I would also be willing to review.

faroit · 2021-09-14T17:19:47Z

@whedon add @hagenw as reviewer

whedon · 2021-09-14T17:19:53Z

OK, @hagenw is now a reviewer

faroit · 2021-09-14T17:20:49Z

@whedon check references

whedon · 2021-09-14T17:21:11Z

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/c2011-0-05897-0 may be a valid DOI for title: Acoustics: sound fields and transducers
- 10.1016/c2017-0-01630-0 may be a valid DOI for title: Acoustics: Sound Fields, Transducers and Vibration
- 10.1121/1.1912304 may be a valid DOI for title: Acoustical beam patterns for bats: some theoretical considerations
- 10.1007/bf00610475 may be a valid DOI for title: Sound radiation patterns in the frequency domain of cries from a Vespertilionid bat
- 10.1098/rspb.2008.1505 may be a valid DOI for title: Echolocating bats emit a highly directional sonar sound beam in the field
- 10.1121/10.0001376 may be a valid DOI for title: High resolution three-dimensional beam radiation pattern of harbour porpoise clicks with implications for passive acoustic monitoring
- 10.3389/conf.fnbeh.2012.27.00243 may be a valid DOI for title: Convergent acoustic field of view in echolocating bats
- 10.1073/pnas.1422843112 may be a valid DOI for title: Bats adjust their mouth gape to zoom their biosonar field of view
- 10.1121/1.3519408 may be a valid DOI for title: A method for estimating the orientation of a directional sound source from source directivity and multi-microphone recordings: Principles and application
- 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103996 may be a valid DOI for title: Sound radiation pattern of the advertisement call of the highly territorial poison frog Allobates femoralis
- 10.1007/bf00657481 may be a valid DOI for title: Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.005 may be a valid DOI for title: Acoustic directionality of red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) song relates to amplitude and singing behaviours
- 10.2307/1367730 may be a valid DOI for title: The importance of directional sound radiation in avian vocalization
- 10.1098/rspb.2009.1519 may be a valid DOI for title: Birds adjust acoustic directionality to beam their antipredator calls to predators and conspecifics
- 10.2307/3676376 may be a valid DOI for title: Directionality of blackbird vocalization. Implications for vocal communication and its further study
- 10.1007/s00265-006-0343-5 may be a valid DOI for title: Differences in acoustic directionality among vocalizations of the male red-winged blackbird (Agelaius pheoniceus) are related to function in communication
- 10.1046/j.1439-0361.2002.02045.x may be a valid DOI for title: Sound radiation patterns in nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) songs

INVALID DOIs

- None

thejasvibr · 2021-09-19T08:10:44Z

@whedon check references

whedon · 2021-09-19T08:10:52Z

Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:

Failed to parse BibTeX on value "doi" (NAME) [#<BibTeX::Bibliography data=[18]>, "@", #<BibTeX::Entry >, {:title=>["Birds adjust acoustic directionality to beam their antipredator calls to predators and conspecifics"], :author=>["Yorzinski, Jessica L and Patricelli, Gail L"], :journal=>["Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences"], :volume=>["277"], :number=>["1683"], :pages=>["923--932"], :year=>["2010"], :publisher=>["The Royal Society"]}]

thejasvibr · 2021-09-19T08:17:34Z

@whedon check references

whedon · 2021-09-19T08:17:42Z

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/c2011-0-05897-0 is OK
- 10.1016/c2017-0-01630-0 is OK
- 10.1121/1.1912304 is OK
- 10.1007/bf00610475 is OK
- 10.1121/10.0001376 is OK
- 10.1038/nature11664 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.1422843112 is OK
- 10.1121/1.3519408 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103996 is OK
- 10.1007/bf00657481 is OK
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.005 is OK
- 10.2307/1367730 is OK
- 10.1098/rspb.2009.1519 is OK
- 10.2307/3676376 is OK
- 10.1007/s00265-006-0343-5 is OK
- 10.1046/j.1439-0361.2002.02045.x is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1098/rspb.2008.1505 may be a valid DOI for title: Echolocating bats emit a highly directional sonar sound beam in the field

INVALID DOIs

- None

thejasvibr · 2021-09-19T08:27:12Z

@whedon check references

whedon · 2021-09-19T08:27:19Z

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/c2011-0-05897-0 is OK
- 10.1016/c2017-0-01630-0 is OK
- 10.1121/1.1912304 is OK
- 10.1007/bf00610475 is OK
- 10.1098/rspb.2008.1505  is OK
- 10.1121/10.0001376 is OK
- 10.1038/nature11664 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.1422843112 is OK
- 10.1121/1.3519408 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.7717/peerj-cs.103 is OK
- 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103996 is OK
- 10.1007/bf00657481 is OK
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.005 is OK
- 10.2307/1367730 is OK
- 10.1098/rspb.2009.1519 is OK
- 10.2307/3676376 is OK
- 10.1007/s00265-006-0343-5 is OK
- 10.1046/j.1439-0361.2002.02045.x is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

thejasvibr · 2021-09-19T08:29:38Z

@faroit apologies for the delay in DOI correction - they seem to be all fixed now.
Hello @hagenw and @nils-werner many thanks for agreeing to review - looking forward to hearing from you!

faroit · 2021-09-20T13:24:58Z

@whedon generate pdf

whedon · 2021-09-20T13:25:35Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

faroit · 2021-09-20T13:32:07Z

@thejasvibr paper looks good so far. We can start the review process

faroit · 2021-09-20T13:35:25Z

@whedon start review

whedon · 2021-09-20T13:35:30Z

OK, I've started the review over in #3740.

whedon added the pre-review label Aug 9, 2021

whedon added HTML Jupyter Notebook Python labels Aug 9, 2021

arfon added the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Aug 9, 2021

whedon assigned faroit Aug 12, 2021

faroit removed the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Sep 6, 2021

whedon assigned faroit and nils-werner and unassigned faroit Sep 9, 2021

whedon unassigned faroit and nils-werner Sep 14, 2021

whedon assigned faroit, hagenw and nils-werner Sep 14, 2021

whedon closed this as completed Sep 20, 2021

[PRE REVIEW]: beamshapes: a Python package to generate directivity patterns for various sound source models #3590

[PRE REVIEW]: beamshapes: a Python package to generate directivity patterns for various sound source models #3590

Comments

whedon commented Aug 9, 2021 • edited Loading

Status

whedon commented Aug 9, 2021

whedon commented Aug 9, 2021

whedon commented Aug 9, 2021

whedon commented Aug 9, 2021

whedon commented Aug 9, 2021

arfon commented Aug 9, 2021

faroit commented Aug 10, 2021

arfon commented Aug 12, 2021

whedon commented Aug 12, 2021

arfon commented Aug 12, 2021

thejasvibr commented Aug 12, 2021

whedon commented Aug 12, 2021

thejasvibr commented Aug 12, 2021

whedon commented Aug 12, 2021

thejasvibr commented Aug 12, 2021

faroit commented Sep 6, 2021 • edited Loading

thejasvibr commented Sep 8, 2021

faroit commented Sep 8, 2021 • edited Loading

nils-werner commented Sep 9, 2021

faroit commented Sep 9, 2021

whedon commented Sep 9, 2021

hagenw commented Sep 14, 2021

faroit commented Sep 14, 2021

whedon commented Sep 14, 2021

faroit commented Sep 14, 2021

whedon commented Sep 14, 2021

thejasvibr commented Sep 19, 2021

whedon commented Sep 19, 2021

thejasvibr commented Sep 19, 2021

whedon commented Sep 19, 2021

thejasvibr commented Sep 19, 2021

whedon commented Sep 19, 2021

thejasvibr commented Sep 19, 2021

faroit commented Sep 20, 2021

whedon commented Sep 20, 2021

faroit commented Sep 20, 2021

faroit commented Sep 20, 2021

whedon commented Sep 20, 2021

whedon commented Aug 9, 2021 •

edited

Loading

faroit commented Sep 6, 2021 •

edited

Loading

faroit commented Sep 8, 2021 •

edited

Loading