[PRE REVIEW]: PyCUTEst: an open source Python package of optimization test problems

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @jfowkes (Jaroslav Fowkes)
Repository: https://github.com/jfowkes/pycutest
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 1.2
Editor: @diehlpk
Reviewers: @GuillaumeDerval, @stsievert
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d1664af7c708cd78b5478beaa27878e6"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d1664af7c708cd78b5478beaa27878e6/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d1664af7c708cd78b5478beaa27878e6/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d1664af7c708cd78b5478beaa27878e6)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jfowkes. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@jfowkes if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.22 s (484.6 files/s, 132862.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                      13           2405           2470           9222
HTML                            31            576             87           4439
SVG                              1              0              0           2671
Python                          23            867           3121           1640
CSS                              4            191             35            759
reStructuredText                29            234            137            419
Bourne Shell                     1             16             16            284
YAML                             3              9              4            100
TeX                              1              7              0             63
Markdown                         1             17              0             57
INI                              1              1              0             17
make                             1              4              6             10
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           109           4327           5876          19681
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 669

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1145/200979.201043 is OK
- 10.1145/962437.962439 is OK
- 10.1007/s10589-014-9687-3 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1188851 is OK
- 10.1137/15M1020575 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[danielskatz]

👋 @galessiorob - would you be willing to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @galessiorob as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[galessiorob]

Thanks for the invite @danielskatz I'm a bit tight on bandwidth right now, thanks for understanding.

[arfon]

@editorialbot invite @diehlpk as editor

👋 @diehlpk – would you be willing to handle this submission for us?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot assign @diehlpk as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @diehlpk is now the editor

[diehlpk]

Hi @stsievert @arn1291 @GuillaumeDerval would you be interested in reviewing this paper?

[Athene-ai]

@diehlpk I would like to review this paper :-)

[GuillaumeDerval]

I can review the paper but not before the end of next week :-(

[diehlpk]

I can review the paper but not before the end of next week :-(

@GuillaumeDerva sounds good.

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot assign @GuillaumeDerva as reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @diehlpk, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor

# Remind an author or reviewer to return to a review after a 
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for archive
@editorialbot set 10.21105/zenodo.12345 as archive

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept

# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @GuillaumeDerva as reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @GuillaumeDerva as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@GuillaumeDerva added to the reviewers list!

[GuillaumeDerval]

@diehlpk : It is @GuillaumeDerval and not @GuillaumeDerva (missing l)

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @GuillaumeDerval as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@GuillaumeDerval added to the reviewers list!

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot remove @GuillaumeDerva as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@GuillaumeDerva removed from the reviewers list!

[diehlpk]

@diehlpk : It is @GuillaumeDerval and not @GuillaumeDerva (missing l)

Thanks, I fixed it.

[stsievert]

@diehlpk I wish I could. However, I'll unfortunately have to decline.

[diehlpk]

HI @MiftariB @Viech @tmigot would you be interested in reviewing this paper?

[Viech]

This looks cool but I won't have time to review this month due to holidays and an official trip. If this gets stuck in june, I can fill in.

[MiftariB]

@diehlpk thanks for the opportunity to review this paper but @GuillaumeDerval and I work literally in the same office and I believe that the review in itself would highly benefit from two completely different points of view. So I will have to decline the offer for now. If you don't find someone else, you can recontact me.

[stsievert]

@diehlpk I changed my mind. I can do it, but it won't be prompt or even quick.

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @stsievert as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@stsievert added to the reviewers list!

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #4377.