[PRE REVIEW]: Pynteny: a Python package to perform synteny-aware, profile HMM-based searches in sequence databases

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @Robaina (Dr. Semidán Robaina Estévez)
Repository: https://github.com/Robaina/Pynteny
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Reviewers: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6265f4aba18fd5e15b7ddce5909b06c"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6265f4aba18fd5e15b7ddce5909b06c/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6265f4aba18fd5e15b7ddce5909b06c/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6265f4aba18fd5e15b7ddce5909b06c)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Robaina. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Robaina if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.06 s (807.7 files/s, 116189.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          16            498            807           2439
Markdown                        12            225              0            476
YAML                            11             35             16            311
TeX                              1             13              0            197
Jupyter Notebook                 4              0           1720            184
TOML                             1              3              0             47
Dockerfile                       2              5             12             28
JSON                             2              5              0             28
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            49            784           2555           3710
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1038

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1093/nar/gkt263 is OK
- 10.1186/s12859-019-2996-x is OK
- 10.1186/1471-2105-11-431 is OK
- 10.1038/nbt1004-1315 is OK
- 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkr1293 is OK
- 10.1101/2021.06.03.446950 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab007 is OK
- 10.1126/science.1153917 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq413 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.78526 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1105 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman is now the editor

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot add me as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman added to the reviewers list!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

This submission relates to this PyOpenSci review: pyOpenSci/software-submission#67

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5289.