[PRE REVIEW]: Arabica: A Python package for exploratory analysis of text data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @PetrKorab (Petr Koráb)
Repository: https://github.com/PetrKorab/Arabica
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: 1.7.1
Editor: @oliviaguest
Reviewers: @linuxscout, @amitkumarj441
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c036ff8390e992855fae27db2536b3a8"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c036ff8390e992855fae27db2536b3a8/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c036ff8390e992855fae27db2536b3a8/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c036ff8390e992855fae27db2536b3a8)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @PetrKorab. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@PetrKorab if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: paper joss

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: paper joss

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[arfon]

@editorialbot set main as branch

[editorialbot]

Done! branch is now main

[arfon]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.21 s (344.6 files/s, 159188.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                      13           4507           4506          16694
CSS                              6            496            126           1791
HTML                             8            317              0            905
Python                          11            218             46            898
reStructuredText                17            394            340            395
Jupyter Notebook                 2              0            147            357
Markdown                         2             65              0            195
TeX                              1             13              0            125
XHTML                            3             14              0             79
XML                              3              0              0             67
YAML                             3              6             19             27
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            71           6042           5192          21568
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 0

[arfon]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[arfon]

@PetrKorab – I don't think @editorialbot knows how to find your paper when it's in a path with a space in it. Could you please rename the paper joss folder to paper-joss?

[arfon]

Also, it would be very helpful to describe how your submission varies in scope/goals to this one: #4886

[PetrKorab]

@arfon Thanks. I moved the paper files to the main directory (https://github.com/PetrKorab/Arabica). The paper should now compile without problems. I also updated the paper with the contribution to the literature you mentioned.

[arfon]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[arfon]

@editorialbot query scope

@PetrKorab – due to the relatively limited size of this submission, I'm going to ask the JOSS editorial team to take a look at whether this submission is in scope for us. This will likely take a couple of weeks to complete.

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

TextDescriptives: A Python package for calculating a large variety of metrics from text
Submitting author: @HLasse
Handling editor: @fabian-s (Active)
Reviewers: @RichardLitt, @linuxscout
Similarity score: 0.8207

textnets: A Python package for text analysis with networks
Submitting author: @jboynyc
Handling editor: @gkthiruvathukal (Active)
Reviewers: @sara-02, @tresoldi
Similarity score: 0.8147

niacin: A Python package for text data enrichment
Submitting author: @deniederhut
Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active)
Reviewers: @BayesforDays, @sara-02
Similarity score: 0.8066

LISC: A Python Package for Scientific Literature Collection and Analysis
Submitting author: @TomDonoghue
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @timClicks, @linuxscout
Similarity score: 0.8030

Altair: Interactive Statistical Visualizations for Python
Submitting author: @domoritz
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @dnszafir, @terrytangyuan, @kellieotto
Similarity score: 0.7993

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[arfon]

@PetrKorab – I don't see any way of testing this software. Could you please explain to me how this library is tested?

[PetrKorab]

@arfon I have added "tests" folder that contains the Travis CI test of the code generating the graphs used in the paper. I can provide additional manual tests, if necessary.

[arfon]

@arfon I have added "tests" folder that contains the Travis CI test of the code generating the graphs used in the paper. I can provide additional manual tests, if necessary.

This is probably useful, but not what I'm looking for. As a part of the JOSS review process, your software needs to have tests for reviewers to exercise (see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html#tests). Without these, the package cannot be reviewed.

[PetrKorab]

@arfon The "tests" folder in the main branch now contains automated tests with Travis CI (Circle Ci alike). The reviews can fork the repository and make pull requests to run the test.

[arfon]

@PetrKorab – your software has passed the scope review. I'm now moving it to be 'waitlisted' while we await a suitable editor to take this submission on.

[oliviaguest]

@linuxscout @amitkumarj441 @kikarimullah can any or all of you review this, please? ☺️

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @oliviaguest is now the editor

[amitkumarj441]

Hi @oliviaguest Sure, I would be happy to help.

[linuxscout]

Ok, I can review it.

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot add @linuxscout as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@linuxscout added to the reviewers list!

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot add @amitkumarj441 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@amitkumarj441 added to the reviewers list!

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6186.

[oliviaguest]

@linuxscout @amitkumarj441 @PetrKorab please go to #6186; and thank you to the reviewers for agreeing to review! 😊

[PetrKorab]

@linuxscout @amitkumarj441 @oliviaguest Thanks !