[PRE REVIEW]: Augmenty: A Python Library for Structured Text Augmentation

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @KennethEnevoldsen (Kenneth C. Enevoldsen)
Repository: https://github.com/KennethEnevoldsen/augmenty
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 1.4.2
Editor: @arfon
Reviewers: @sap218, @wdduncan
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/df84463b79f27f40a4da97f20b08a958"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/df84463b79f27f40a4da97f20b08a958/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/df84463b79f27f40a4da97f20b08a958/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/df84463b79f27f40a4da97f20b08a958)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @KennethEnevoldsen. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@KennethEnevoldsen if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.11 s (1012.2 files/s, 83566.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          75            728           1043           2682
Markdown                        12           1062              0           1647
JSON                             3              0              0            415
YAML                             8             44             20            318
TeX                              1              2              0            194
reStructuredText                13            151            134            173
TOML                             1             10              4            161
Jupyter Notebook                 2              0            668             82
make                             1              8              0             31
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           116           2005           1869           5703
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1072

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.442 is OK
- 10.18653/v1/D19-1670 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1212303 is OK
- 10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-demos.6 is OK
- 10.18653/v1/2023.latechclfl-1.13 is OK
- 10.3115/v1/D14-1162 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.21437/interspeech.2019-2680 may be a valid DOI for title: SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognition
- 10.1007/978-3-030-57321-8_21 may be a valid DOI for title: Improving short text classification through global augmentation methods
- 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.16 may be a valid DOI for title: TextAttack: A Framework for Adversarial Attacks, Data Augmentation, and Adversarial Training in NLP

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Augmentor: An Image Augmentation Library for Machine Learning
Submitting author: @mdbloice
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @sealhuang
Similarity score: 0.8243

Jabberwocky: an ontology-aware toolkit for manipulating text
Submitting author: @sap218
Handling editor: @majensen (Active)
Reviewers: @wdduncan, @balhoff
Similarity score: 0.8016

textnets: A Python package for text analysis with networks
Submitting author: @jboynyc
Handling editor: @gkthiruvathukal (Active)
Reviewers: @sara-02, @tresoldi
Similarity score: 0.8004

Adeft: Acromine-based Disambiguation of Entities from Text with applications to the biomedical literature
Submitting author: @johnbachman
Handling editor: @brainstorm (Retired)
Reviewers: @GullyAPCBurns, @gbader
Similarity score: 0.7992

Ipyannotator: the infinitely hackable annotation framework
Submitting author: @itepifanio
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @csadorf, @matthewfeickert
Similarity score: 0.7940

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[arfon]

@KennethEnevoldsen - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[KennethEnevoldsen]

Totally understandable. Let me know if I can help out with the backlog - I should be signed up as a reviewer.

[arfon]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @arfon is now the editor

[arfon]

👋 @KennethEnevoldsen – I'll be the editor for this submission. If you know of any people who might be able to give a good review of this submission, please let me know here. I shall also start looking for reviewers.

[KennethEnevoldsen]

Here is 5 people from the reviewer list. Generally, I would go for people with an NLP/Python background. Augmentation is not as popular in NLP as in computer vision so at least one reviewer with experience in CV might be ideal, though not required (as they most likely also will have some experience in augmentation).

• dmnapolitano
• harishsiravuri
• jhagerer
• Gigi1111
• jinhangjiang

[arfon]

👋 @dmnapolitano @harishsiravuri @jinhangjiang @Gigi1111 would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The submission under consideration is Augmenty: A Python Library for Structured Text Augmentation

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. You can learn more about the process in these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

Based on your experience, we think you might be able to provide a great review of this submission. Please let me know if you think you can help us out!

Many thanks
Arfon

[arfon]

@sap218 @wdduncan @balhoff @jhagerer – 👋 would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The submission under consideration is Augmenty: A Python Library for Structured Text Augmentation

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. You can learn more about the process in these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

Based on your experience, we think you might be able to provide a great review of this submission. Please let me know if you think you can help us out!

Many thanks
Arfon

[sap218]

Hi @arfon 👋 Happy to review this submission!

[arfon]

@editorialbot add @sap218 as reviewer

@sap218 – excellent, thank you! If it's OK with you, I'll wait another few days before opening the review in the hope we can find a second reviewer by then. Thanks for your patience!

[editorialbot]

@sap218 added to the reviewers list!

[wdduncan]

I'm not an NLP expert, but I know a little. So, if you are looking for an expert (or someone with a lot of NLP experience), I would not be a good choice. Otherwise, I am willing to review.

[arfon]

@wdduncan – thanks for your offer of help. I'm struggling to find additional reviewers so would like to take you up on your kind offer here!

[arfon]

@editorialbot add @wdduncan as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@wdduncan added to the reviewers list!

[arfon]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6370.

[arfon]

@sap218, @wdduncan, @KennethEnevoldsen – see you over in #6370 where the review will take place.