[PRE REVIEW]: SitCoM: Modular framework for the integration of (extreme) events and their impacts in Unity

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @ruedi99ms (Niklas Suhre)
Repository: https://github.com/ruedi99ms/SitCoM
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 1.0
Editor: @osorensen
Reviewers: @luxaritas, @ApocalyVec
Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/afd7fb1d287fc1e36cd71cf4cae79e29"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/afd7fb1d287fc1e36cd71cf4cae79e29/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/afd7fb1d287fc1e36cd71cf4cae79e29/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/afd7fb1d287fc1e36cd71cf4cae79e29)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ruedi99ms. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ruedi99ms if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=6.55 s (552.9 files/s, 100278.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C#                            2838          68923          75669         337897
Unity-Prefab                    60              0              0          70407
JSON                           136             23              0          63471
Markdown                       459           7942             16          19409
HLSL                            21            702             98           2646
Objective-C                     12            287            115           1773
YAML                             7              3             18           1289
C/C++ Header                    62            334            725            961
PO File                          1            456            405            946
Objective-C++                    7            139             21            580
SVG                              5              2              2            499
XML                             10              0              0            461
C++                              1            103             30            344
TeX                              1             11              1             65
CMake                            1              1              0             13
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                          3621          78926          77100         500761
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[365:ANGOCE]2.0.CO;2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102770 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1093/wentk/9780190866112.003.0002 may be a valid DOI for title: Extreme Weather and Climate Change

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 697

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Water Systems Integrated Modelling framework, WSIMOD: A Python package for integrated modelling of water quality and quantity across the water cycle
Submitting author: @barneydobson
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @cheginit, @jlarsen-usgs
Similarity score: 0.8012

The Basic Model Interface 2.0: A standard interface for coupling numerical models in the geosciences
Submitting author: @mdpiper
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @yangbai90, @teuben
Similarity score: 0.8004

CoPro: a data-driven modelling framework for conflict risk projections
Submitting author: @JannisHoch
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @soodoku, @sbenthall
Similarity score: 0.8003

SimSGamE : Scheduling simulator for modern game engines
Submitting author: @baptisteCoye
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @azoitl, @hwloidl
Similarity score: 0.7996

SCONE: Open Source Software for Predictive Simulation of Biological Motion
Submitting author: @tgeijten
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @modenaxe, @demotu
Similarity score: 0.7965

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[oliviaguest]

@crvernon @diehlpk @sbenthall can any of you take this on? ☺️

[diehlpk]

@oliviaguest I have 5 papers on my list, and I do think I can provide a timely review.

[oliviaguest]

@diehlpk do you mean "do" or "don't"? 😅

[diehlpk]

I do not have time, sorry.

[osorensen]

@editorialbot add @osorensen as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @osorensen is now the editor

[osorensen]

I'll take it @oliviaguest

[osorensen]

👋 @shahchiragh, @mikemahoney218, @ApocalyVec, @ahmadawais, @luxaritas, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[mikemahoney218]

Sorry, I don't currently have the bandwidth (or frankly, the C# experience) to give this a good review.

[osorensen]

Thanks for the quick response @mikemahoney218

[luxaritas]

I can take this review

[osorensen]

@editorialbot add @luxaritas as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@luxaritas added to the reviewers list!

[osorensen]

👋 @ecomodeller, @nmullins, @xirdneh, @ozanerturk, @muchrons would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[ecomodeller]

By quick glance, it seems out of scope for my competence.

[ozanerturk]

I'll also take a raincheck, out of scope.

[muchrons]

Unfortunately I have no competences in this area.

[osorensen]

👋 @JannisHoch, @tgeijten would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[osorensen]

@ruedi99ms, as you may have noticed, I have some trouble finding a second reviewer for your submission. If you have any suggestions, I would be grateful.

[tgeijten]

Out of scope for me as well

[osorensen]

Thanks for the quick response @tgeijten

[JannisHoch]

unfortunately out of my scope too

[osorensen]

@jackbrookes @ionlights, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[ApocalyVec]

Hey Øystein, I’m happy to be review this one if it’s still available :) Best, — Leo

…

On Mar 8, 2024 at 5:39 AM -0500, Øystein Sørensen ***@***.***>, wrote: @jackbrookes @ionlights, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[osorensen]

Yes @ApocalyVec. Thanks a lot!

[osorensen]

@editorialbot add @ApocalyVec as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@ApocalyVec added to the reviewers list!

[osorensen]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6458.