[PRE REVIEW]: gollum: An intuitive programmatic and visual interface for precomputed synthetic spectral model grids

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @Sujay-Shankar (Sujay Shankar)
Repository: https://github.com/BrownDwarf/gollum
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.3.0
Editor: @warrickball
Reviewers: @rhdtownsend, @DanielAndreasen
Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8d3f0bad9a8df509972891c15daf21b1"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8d3f0bad9a8df509972891c15daf21b1/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8d3f0bad9a8df509972891c15daf21b1/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8d3f0bad9a8df509972891c15daf21b1)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @SujayShankar2001. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@SujayShankar2001 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (725.9 files/s, 154263.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          14            588            714           2865
TeX                              1             17              0            259
Jupyter Notebook                10              0           2933            225
YAML                             4              5              2            133
reStructuredText                 5             70             41             84
Markdown                         2             22              0             63
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            38            714           3698           3664
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 710

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.10016569 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6539458 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/aca0a2 is OK
- 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/128 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201219058 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac141d is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2402.00758 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/acc8cb is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2402.00756 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[dfm]

@SujayShankar2001 — Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Astronomical échelle spectroscopy data analysis with muler
Submitting author: @gully
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @bmorris3, @wtgee
Similarity score: 0.8338

The Dusty Evolved Star Kit (DESK): A Python package for fitting the Spectral Energy Distribution of Evolved Stars
Submitting author: @s-goldman
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @Deech08, @TomGoffrey
Similarity score: 0.8233

PyAutoGalaxy: Open-Source Multiwavelength Galaxy Structure & Morphology
Submitting author: @Jammy2211
Handling editor: @christinahedges (Retired)
Reviewers: @alexandergagliano, @sloneil
Similarity score: 0.8229

Gala: A Python package for galactic dynamics
Submitting author: @adrn
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @crawfordsm
Similarity score: 0.8211

FASMA 2.0: A Python package for stellar parameters and chemical abundances
Submitting author: @MariaTsantaki
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @warrickball, @ipelupessy
Similarity score: 0.8204

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[warrickball]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @warrickball is now the editor

[warrickball]

@editorialbot add @rhdtownsend as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@rhdtownsend added to the reviewers list!

[warrickball]

@editorialbot add @DanielAndreasen as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@DanielAndreasen added to the reviewers list!

[warrickball]

Hi @SujayShankar2001, sorry for the long wait. The editors have all collectively been very busy but, as you can see, I picked this up a few days ago and our reviewers, @rhdtownsend and @DanielAndreasen, have kindly agreed to review very quickly.

I'll start the main review in a moment after I've double checked the submission metadata.

[warrickball]

Is the author's GitHub username @Sujay-Shankar or @SujayShankar2001? I suspect the former but the metadata has been populated with the latter. @Sujay-Shankar, could you let us know which is correct? I think this is generated from your JOSS profile, so you might want to check that you've put the correct username there.

[Sujay-Shankar]

Hi @warrickball , thanks for picking up our paper for review! Sorry about the name mismatch, I recently changed my GitHub username. Sujay-Shankar is the new and current one, SujayShankar2001 is the old one. I just went into my JOSS profile and updated the username, thanks for reminding me!

[warrickball]

No problem! It's easy to fix. I just wanted to check before doing so. I'll start the review proper in a moment.

[warrickball]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6601.