[PRE REVIEW]: PYLIWC: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count in Python

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @camille1 (Camille LACAN)
Repository: https://github.com/camille1/pyliwc
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 0.0.1
Editor: @logological
Reviewers: @HLasse, @seyyaw
Managing EiC: Samuel Forbes

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6e269ff8dfc21967a5f1998fd6e2497"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6e269ff8dfc21967a5f1998fd6e2497/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6e269ff8dfc21967a5f1998fd6e2497/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6e269ff8dfc21967a5f1998fd6e2497)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @camille1. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@camille1 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.03 s (1132.0 files/s, 289756.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              1              0             39           1324
Jupyter Notebook                11              0           3474            853
Python                           4            117            218            425
Markdown                         2            110              0            280
CSV                              2            128              0            141
TeX                              1             16              0            100
YAML                             6              9              6            100
INI                              1              5              0             41
CSS                              1              6              0             31
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            29            391           3737           3295
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    35	Camille Lacan

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1177/00222429221100750 is OK
- 10.1007/s11002-022-09635-6 is OK
- 10.1177/0022242919873106 is OK
- 10.1093/jcr/ucx104 is OK
- 10.1126/sciadv.aba2196 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2015
- No DOI given, and none found for title: spaCy 2: Natural language understanding with Bloom...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The development and psychometric properties of LIW...

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1217

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: Apache License 2.0 (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

TextDescriptives: A Python package for calculating a large variety of metrics from text
Submitting author: @HLasse
Handling editor: @fabian-s (Active)
Reviewers: @RichardLitt, @linuxscout
Similarity score: 0.6520

TTLocVis: A Twitter Topic Location Visualization Package
Submitting author: @xillig
Handling editor: @trallard (Retired)
Reviewers: @sara-02, @linuxscout, @aozorahime
Similarity score: 0.6236

ConTEXT Explorer: a web-based text analysis tool for exploring and visualizing concepts across time
Submitting author: @alicia-ziying-yang
Handling editor: @faroit (Active)
Reviewers: @sara-02, @baileythegreen
Similarity score: 0.6162

TRUNAJOD: A text complexity library to enhance natural language processing
Submitting author: @dpalmasan
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @mbdemoraes, @apiad
Similarity score: 0.6099

textnets: A Python package for text analysis with networks
Submitting author: @jboynyc
Handling editor: @gkthiruvathukal (Active)
Reviewers: @sara-02, @tresoldi
Similarity score: 0.6044

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot invite @logological as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[logological]

@editorialbot add @logological as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @logological is now the editor

[logological]

@seyyaw @HLasse @alicia-ziying-yang @dpalmasan Would you be willing and able to review this manuscript for the Journal of Open Source Software?

[HLasse]

Sure, I'd be happy to 👍

[logological]

@HLasse Thanks! I'll add you as a reviewer. I'll open a separate issue for the review once I locate one or two additional reviewers.

[logological]

@editorialbot add @HLasse as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@HLasse added to the reviewers list!

[logological]

@seyyaw I saw that you gave a thumbs-up to my comment above. Does this mean you're willing to serve as a reviewer for this paper?

[seyyaw]

@logological I am new to this kind of review. Does the review also include code review? This is the paper to review right?

Let me know and I am happy to help!

[logological]

@seyyaw Reviewing for JOSS is fairly easy -- we prepare a checklist for you that you can work through. You'll need to examine both the paper and the code (which may involve installing and running the software in order to do some basic checks). The entire review takes place via GitHub issues. Any issues you find should be reported in the review issue, or raised as separate issues in the repository of the code/paper under review. The authors then address those issues (by discussing them with you and/or making the necessary changes to the code/paper) so that you're able to proceed with the checklist.

Since you say you're happy to help, I'll go ahead and add you as a reviewer and we can begin the review. This will take place in a separate GitHub issue of which you will be notified. Please let me know if you have any questions!

[logological]

@editorialbot add @seyyaw as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@seyyaw added to the reviewers list!

[logological]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7119.