[PRE REVIEW]: motion-base: A Ground Motion Database

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @TLCFEM (Theodore Chang)
Repository: https://github.com/TLCFEM/motion-base
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: v241029
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/39b525cf3c6fd3be560da2b2cefba890"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/39b525cf3c6fd3be560da2b2cefba890/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/39b525cf3c6fd3be560da2b2cefba890/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/39b525cf3c6fd3be560da2b2cefba890)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @TLCFEM. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@TLCFEM if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 is OK
- 10.1016/s0267-7261(05)80015-6 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.05 s (1668.2 files/s, 175867.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          34            712            546           2718
TypeScript                      10            177            154           1996
SVG                             11             14              3           1233
YAML                             8              4              1            561
Bourne Shell                     6             49              0            257
Markdown                         4            106              0            245
JSON                             4              0              0             97
TOML                             1              5              0             70
JavaScript                       2             10             20             67
Dockerfile                       3             24              0             35
TeX                              1              2              0             26
HTML                             1              0              0             15
CSS                              1              1              0             13
PowerShell                       1              2              0              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            87           1106            724           7342
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   124	Theodore Chang
    31	dependabot[bot]
    11	github-actions[bot]
     1	Theodore

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 541

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

SampleDB: A sample and measurement metadata database
Submitting author: @FlorianRhiem
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @stuartcampbell, @dvanic
Similarity score: 0.6936

RESOURCECODE: A Python package for statistical analysis of sea-state hindcast data
Submitting author: @NRaillard
Handling editor: @marcosvital (Active)
Reviewers: @krober10nd, @platipodium, @malmans2
Similarity score: 0.6767

sacio: A library for Seismic Analysis Code data files
Submitting author: @savage13
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @chad-iris, @mbegnaud
Similarity score: 0.6740

yam: Yet another monitoring tool using correlations of ambient noise
Submitting author: @trichter
Handling editor: @elbeejay (Active)
Reviewers: @hfmark, @hemmelig, @ThomasMGeo
Similarity score: 0.6676

Underworld2: Python Geodynamics Modelling for Desktop, HPC and Cloud
Submitting author: @jmansour
Handling editor: @leouieda (Retired)
Reviewers: @gassmoeller, @gabersyd
Similarity score: 0.6661

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

SampleDB: A sample and measurement metadata database
Submitting author: @FlorianRhiem
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @stuartcampbell, @dvanic
Similarity score: 0.6936

RESOURCECODE: A Python package for statistical analysis of sea-state hindcast data
Submitting author: @NRaillard
Handling editor: @marcosvital (Active)
Reviewers: @krober10nd, @platipodium, @malmans2
Similarity score: 0.6772

sacio: A library for Seismic Analysis Code data files
Submitting author: @savage13
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @chad-iris, @mbegnaud
Similarity score: 0.6736

yam: Yet another monitoring tool using correlations of ambient noise
Submitting author: @trichter
Handling editor: @elbeejay (Active)
Reviewers: @hfmark, @hemmelig, @ThomasMGeo
Similarity score: 0.6675

Underworld2: Python Geodynamics Modelling for Desktop, HPC and Cloud
Submitting author: @jmansour
Handling editor: @leouieda (Retired)
Reviewers: @gassmoeller, @gabersyd
Similarity score: 0.6662

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[kyleniemeyer]

Hello @TLCFEM thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

While we are waiting, could you please:

• Explain how this software is tested and how reviewers/users would run the test suite? Being able to test the capabilities of software is important (and required for JOSS as part of the review).
• Suggest some potential reviewers from our database, though please do not tag them with @ directly.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!