Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Opening nominations for the next year's voting CPC members #472

Closed
eemeli opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Opening nominations for the next year's voting CPC members #472

eemeli opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@eemeli
Copy link
Member

eemeli commented Feb 25, 2020

As mentioned in our governance document, the term for all voting members of the CPC is ending on 31 March 2020, and new members need to be selected before then.

For impact projects, next year's members need to be nominated (or re-nominated) by each project, and then ratified by the CPC.

For non-impact projects, this means that we need to elect the two representatives. This election process specifies that a two-week nomination period precedes this election, which means that this ought to start Real Soon Now.

To clarify, this issue is not the issue officially announcing the opening of the nomination period.

@boneskull
Copy link

Am I right that we're going to need to shed some voting members?

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

@boneskull I think the answer is yes. Last year we agreed to add all who applied but the governance states that there are only 2 voting CPC members from the non-impact projects: https://github.com/openjs-foundation/cross-project-council/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md#election-process-for-non-impact-voting-cpc-members

We of course can propose changes, but I'm thinking we might cut down on which roles need to be filled by voting members (ex Chair and Board representative) instead so that there is a lower impact on having regular members versus voting members in terms of candidates. The other option we have which we have not exercised is having the voting members elect 2 of the regular members to be voting members.

@jorydotcom
Copy link
Contributor

Opened #488 per our discussion here, in the meetings & on the slack channel

@eemeli
Copy link
Member Author

eemeli commented Mar 9, 2020

Closing as resolved. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants