Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MCTS result on MATH #87

Open
2 of 4 tasks
QQW-ing opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 of 4 tasks

MCTS result on MATH #87

QQW-ing opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@QQW-ing
Copy link

QQW-ing commented Dec 16, 2024

System Info

Operating System=Linux
Python version= 3.10
Hardware=A100 40g

Who can help?

@ziyuwan

Information

  • The official example scripts
  • My own modified scripts

Tasks

  • An officially supported task in the codebase (such as scrips/, ...)
  • My own task or dataset (give details below)

Reproduction

Hi, thanks for your excellent work.

When I use "Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Instruct" as the base model, I got "[{"majority_vote": 0.824, "total_completion_tokens": 2990.498}]". However, when I use another base model like 'mistral-7b-sft' on MATH , I got result '[{"majority_vote": 0.29, "total_completion_tokens": 963.846}]' in vanilla MCTS process.

Expected behavior

I wonder if the result is reasonable. And can you give some results based on your experiment? Many thanks!!!

@QQW-ing QQW-ing added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant