You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Unsure about existing performance of Rare Terms Aggregation at the moment, but looking through initial code at high level, it looks like that this aggregation also utilizes iterating through each document.
The idea is to utilize the terms frequency from Lucene similar to #11643 and avoid iterating through individual documents.
Next Steps:
Measure/gather existing performance of rare terms aggregation
Improve upon the implementation if it can be done with above ideation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@sandeshkr419 Lets make these issues distinct if they need to be tracked separately, but overall idea capture around aggregation perf seems like a single topic
Hi @peternied - keeping these issues separate since the underlying search operations, their code flows and ideas to optimize will be different. They do fall under the aggregation category and there is a probablity that these may share some optimization ideas but for now lets track each of them separately without one being influenced by the other.
Unsure about existing performance of Rare Terms Aggregation at the moment, but looking through initial code at high level, it looks like that this aggregation also utilizes iterating through each document.
The idea is to utilize the terms frequency from Lucene similar to #11643 and avoid iterating through individual documents.
Next Steps:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: