-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Remote Store] Create abstraction CompositeStore which will encapsulate local and remote store #3719
Labels
enhancement
Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request
Storage:Durability
Issues and PRs related to the durability framework
Comments
sachinpkale
added
enhancement
Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request
untriaged
labels
Jun 27, 2022
This was referenced Jun 27, 2022
saratvemulapalli
added
Storage:Durability
Issues and PRs related to the durability framework
and removed
untriaged
labels
Jun 28, 2022
17 tasks
6 tasks
Moving to 2.7.0 |
sachinpkale
added
v2.7.0
and removed
v2.6.0
'Issues and PRs related to version v2.6.0'
labels
Feb 20, 2023
Hi @sachinpkale. This issue will be marked for next-release |
Tagging it for next release: |
DarshitChanpura
added
v2.8.0
'Issues and PRs related to version v2.8.0'
and removed
v2.7.0
labels
Apr 17, 2023
@sachinpkale I am planning to take a look at this as a part of the next phase of storage roadmap if it hasn't been picked up yet. |
6 tasks
7 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement
Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request
Storage:Durability
Issues and PRs related to the durability framework
Describe the solution you'd like
As per the comment: #3703 (comment), a
CompositeStore
will encapsulate local and remote storeThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: