Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE]Service time granularity sampling storage #63

Open
YANG-DB opened this issue Jul 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[FEATURE]Service time granularity sampling storage #63

YANG-DB opened this issue Jul 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
content integration / getting-started content enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@YANG-DB
Copy link
Member

YANG-DB commented Jul 29, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem?

I would like to allow users to defined a pre-determining strategy for storing service based dimensions sampling (time-series data point)
This strategy will allow the user's understanding of the domain to define lower granularity storage strategy for services logs that are less critical or less prone to errors.

What solution would you like?

  1. Allow the user to define for each service centric logs related monitoring storage indices - what time granularity to save the data-points into and which aggregation function to use for that (Avg, Max, Min, Sum)
  2. Once defined, the target index that is generated for each service dimension measurement (CPU, Memory, UserCount ) would be using the Index Rollup job to auto aggregate and compact the original measurement index into.
  3. The original measurement index info would be scraped using the Index State Management so that the user dosent have to manually delete the raw data.

Do you have any additional context?

@YANG-DB YANG-DB added enhancement New feature or request untriaged labels Jul 29, 2023
@YANG-DB YANG-DB removed the untriaged label Sep 7, 2023
@YANG-DB YANG-DB added the content integration / getting-started content label Aug 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content integration / getting-started content enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: No status
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant