[BUG] Integration test failures against 2.11

[dblock]

What is the bug?

FAILED test_opensearchpy/test_server/test_rest_api_spec.py::test_rest_api_spec[OpenSearch-main/rest-api-spec/src/main/resources/rest-api-spec/test/search/260_sort_mixed[2]]
FAILED test_opensearchpy/test_server/test_rest_api_spec.py::test_rest_api_spec[OpenSearch-main/rest-api-spec/src/main/resources/rest-api-spec/test/search/90_search_after[4]]

E       opensearchpy.exceptions.RequestError: RequestError(400, 'search_phase_execution_exception', 'Field population is indexed with 2 bytes per dimension, but org.opensearch.index.fielddata.fieldcomparator.FloatValuesComparatorSource$1@2570133f expected 4')

DEBUG    opensearch:base.py:200 < {"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"Field population is indexed with 2 bytes per dimension, but org.opensearch.index.fielddata.fieldcomparator.FloatValuesComparatorSource$1@2570133f expected 4"}],"type":"search_phase_execution_exception","reason":"all shards failed","phase":"query","grouped":true,"failed_shards":[{"shard":0,"index":"test","node":"EMIK3CDxT5qq2xP112An6A","reason":{"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"Field population is indexed with 2 bytes per dimension, but org.opensearch.index.fielddata.fieldcomparator.FloatValuesComparatorSource$1@2570133f expected 4"}}],"caused_by":{"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"Field population is indexed with 2 bytes per dimension, but org.opensearch.index.fielddata.fieldcomparator.FloatValuesComparatorSource$1@2570133f expected 4","caused_by":{"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"Field population is indexed with 2 bytes per dimension, but org.opensearch.index.fielddata.fieldcomparator.FloatValuesComparatorSource$1@2570133f expected 4"}}},"status":400}

https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-py/actions/runs/6868286935/job/18678495702

How can one reproduce the bug?

./.ci/run-tests false 2.11.0 test_rest_api_spec

What is the expected behavior?

Tests to pass.

What is your host/environment?

CI/CD 2.11.

Do you have any additional context?

Seems like those were added in opensearch-project/OpenSearch#11024

[gashutos]

@dblock Why we still run test for 2.11.0 ? We should be running 2.11.1 now right ?

[dblock]

Are these tests supposed to fail against 2.11.0 and will pass on 2.11.1? 2.11.1 has not been released yet. I PRed #584 for 2.11.1 when that's available.

I think the YAML rest test specs should skip the tests when run against 2.11.0 if that's known to be broken, no?

[gashutos]

Are these tests supposed to fail against 2.11.0 and will pass on 2.11.1? 2.11.1 has not been released yet. I PRed #584 for 2.11.1 when that's available.

I think the YAML rest test specs should skip the tests when run against 2.11.0 if that's known to be broken, no?

Makes sense, I didnt know we will be running 2.11.0 once 2.11.1 branch is cut, That is the reason it is passing in. OpenSearch Repo.
Nevermind, raised the PR opensearch-project/OpenSearch#11214