-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
productize redirector service #542
Comments
OK right and then there was a lot of work on https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/coreos/release-browser but I am pretty sure (can't confirm now due to the registry being away) that the "public redirector" code from there was never actually deployed in api.ci. |
OK I realized I can just e.g. Ah and this is useful:
|
Anyways I have created https://github.com/cgwalters/rhcos-redirector |
I think the work to unify the redirector and release browser UI made sense at the time, but for now let's just give ART the absolute minimum thing they actually need to run in production. We don't want to need to rev this thing to roll out new UI for example. So that's the argument for splitting back the redirector. |
Edit: Nevermind, I don't know what I was actually trying to address... 🤦 |
Yes, that's the service we set up that:
|
nodding intensifies |
Done in openshift/release#18496 |
This is related to an internal non-public ticket following up on #477
Basically we need to move our current releases-art-rhcos.svc.ci.openshift.org to an ART hosted production cluster.
Currently, this is:
Notable is:
My recollection is indeed this was created by
oc new-app
and is not stored in https://github.com/openshift/release/ git.The backing image is
registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/rhcos/releases-art
which...is now inaccessible. So we can't easily backreference to the source code.I believe the source code may be https://github.com/cgwalters/os/tree/redirector
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: