Phone numbers should be valid on businesses inside converted houses

[1ec5]

A house that has been converted to a law office would be tagged building=house office=lawyer and would ideally be tagged with a phone number. But the validator flags the phone number as being a potential privacy violation:

Per #5850 (comment), there is logic to exempt features with certain keys. Any business-specific key like office, brand, or website should be added to that heuristic. (Regarding website, self-hosted personal homepages are less common these days, so I figure it’s more likely to indicate the presence of a business.)

[bhousel]

Oh yeah, I've seen this a few times too. Usually I end up just changing the building type to - not one of these:

iD/modules/validations/private_data.js

Lines 10 to 18 in d4d78b4

	// assume that some buildings are private
	var privateBuildingValues = {
	detached: true,
	farm: true,
	house: true,
	residential: true,
	semidetached_house: true,
	static_caravan: true
	};

[quincylvania]

iD won't flag residential buildings that also have one of these tags, so we can just add office to this list.

iD/modules/validations/private_data.js

Lines 20 to 28 in d4d78b4

	// but they might be public if they have one of these other tags
	var publicKeys = {
	amenity: true,
	craft: true,
	historic: true,
	leisure: true,
	shop: true,
	tourism: true
	};

[1ec5]

Usually I end up just changing the building type to - not one of these

building=house is correct tagging – it remains architecturally a house – though building:use could be set to something else like commercial.