What is preferred? Single issue with list of related issues or multiple issues?

[matkoniecz]

I opened

"psychiatrist" is not finding anything

at #778

Now with extra testing I discovered very similar ones:

• "eye doctor" and "eye doctors" should find ophthalmologists and optometrists, I think - asked on https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C01BU04GW7L/p1681807827827619
• psychology seems likewise missing (and psychologist) - but see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-can-i-mark-doctor-office-as-office-of-psychologist/98121
• nurse ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:healthcare%3Dnurse )
• and dialysis (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:healthcare%3Ddialysis ) - done in dialysis center / dialysis clinic (healthcare=dialysis) #793
• OBGYN, ob/gyn should find gynecologist (which may be better named "obstetrician/gynecologist") - see https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C01BU04GW7L/p1675881005275539 (extracted to Additional synonym and maybe a better name for gynecologist #789)
• "pneumonologist" and "lungs" ideally would find Pulmonology (but pneumology and lung finds already - is it good enough) - see more terms for pulmonology #872
• adding medical specialities Helium314/SCEE#408 (comment) mentions dermatovenereology (no yet verified by me, linking so future me will remember it)

should I create separate issues for them?

Note to self: after any part of that issue or #778 is processed continue matkoniecz/Zazolc@934d985

Note to self: see https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/tree/main/data/presets/amenity/doctors

[tyrasd]

I'd say that a single issue for a bunch of closely related topics is fine in order to save you some work and not spam the issue inbox full. It also usually makes reviewing a bit more streamlined because typically background research tasks (e.g. looking up the OSM wiki, taginfo, ohsome stats, etc.) can be done in a single go for multiple related tags.

I'd however open a separate issue for different "tasks/problems", e.g. one issue for missing specializations of doctors, one issue for missing search terms, one issue for missing fields, etc.

That said, if you would however prefer to open individual issues for the various bullet points above, that's also fine for me.

[matkoniecz]

thanks! So this is answered and I will open issues, maybe grouping multiple similar for what I listed here

That said, if you would however prefer to open individual issues for the various bullet points above, that's also fine for me.

I will likely to it at least for language-related ones which are not entirely clear