You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
SVGs are common place and there's a few parts of the docs which highlight the time is which these docs were first written. There's a lot of good stuff, but re-considering page structure and removing unnecessary docs would be good.
SVGs are common place and there's a few parts of the docs which highlight the time is which these docs were first written. There's a lot of good stuff, but re-considering page structure and removing unnecessary docs would be good.
element
&attribute
page data structure -element
pages list all global attributes - do they need to? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Element/circleIs there a way to better marry presentational attributes with CSS properties?
Effort
There's quite a few things to address, so probably a large effort. However the SVG docs are pretty complete.
Dependancies
No changes to the platform should be needed
Community
Not sure if there's much engagement to be had
Momentum
My concern is it's a catch 22 - there's some good stuff in the SVG docs which is possibly going un-noticed
Enabling learners
Would be good to refresh the tutorials and make them more discoverable
Enabling professionals
A more structured approach to the ref docs would help
Underrepresented topics / ethical web
N/A
Operational necessities
N/A
Addressing needs of the Web industry
Making SVG docs better for everyone 💅
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: