Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is LDAP required? #21

Open
MagicFab opened this issue Sep 28, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Is LDAP required? #21

MagicFab opened this issue Sep 28, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@MagicFab
Copy link
Contributor

README indicates LDAP support but it's not clear if it's required. Thanks for clarifying this.
@thomas-pike
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently LDAP is required, as our design requirement was "must be integrated with our LDAP". There are some minor patches I can do that would allow local authentication to work in a rough way, but building a nice user experience for it would take more work.

@MagicFab
Copy link
Contributor Author

@thomas-pike thanks for clarifying this!

Given the context is self-hosted, LAN-only access, I think that would be a nice alternative and a good way to get more adoption (and possibly contributions) for this application. Apache authentication comes to mind, but I am not familiar with your code.

I can help testing, documenting and translating, I'll keep subscribed here and watch any ongoing progress.

I've also made a pull request to add LDAP as a hard requirement in the list in the README.

@mettke mettke mentioned this issue Apr 7, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Adding local user managment mettke/ssh-key-authority
2 participants
@MagicFab @thomas-pike