Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Leader election for olm-operator and catalog-operator #1405

Open
just1900 opened this issue Mar 23, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Leader election for olm-operator and catalog-operator #1405

just1900 opened this issue Mar 23, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@just1900
Copy link

It seems that both olm-operator and catalog-operator don't do leader election yet, will there be any availability issues related to it ?
Or plans to support it? 🙂️

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 22, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label May 22, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added triage/unresolved Indicates an issue that can not or will not be resolved. and removed wontfix labels May 22, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 21, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Jul 21, 2020
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jul 28, 2020
@timflannagan
Copy link
Contributor

Re-opening this as introducing leader election to both of the OLM-related operators seems reasonable.

@timflannagan timflannagan reopened this Jul 21, 2021
@timflannagan timflannagan removed the triage/unresolved Indicates an issue that can not or will not be resolved. label Jul 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants