You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This would allow much quicker commands for subsequent calls in wallet with many utxos. It would then only fetch utxos it can see in the Bitcoin Core wallet but are not yet in the database. Would also delete utxos according to that information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
if this happens, would the wallet db be part of the index.redb, or be it's own new db? I'm just wondering how sharing indexes would work in the future if the wallet is included as part of the index.redb.
We already have a wallet.redb for storing pending etchings. So it's a completely seperate file from index.redb. You can have a look at the logic in src/wallet.rs, there you'll see two tables in the db already. If we add UTXOs to that database it would probably be something like:
This would allow much quicker commands for subsequent calls in wallet with many utxos. It would then only fetch utxos it can see in the Bitcoin Core wallet but are not yet in the database. Would also delete utxos according to that information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: