Future Psychosecurity Ramifications

[HyperCrowd]

We extrapolate what measurable psychosecurity means for human behavior

[HyperCrowd]

When looking into the psychosecurity vulnerabilities of the Blue Church evangelist caste (journalists), i've been pondering how these vulnerabilities can be clustered for narrative operations to build feed forward tributaries

And when thinking about that, I've found myself thinking about proof-of-work mechanisms: An unbroken story in which each part of the story is reproducible because of math... and how that is called "proof-of-work"

If a divine story had such reproducibility, you wouldn't need an evangelist caste at all

So then I started thinking about alternatives... and how the stock market is technically driven by heuristic assemblages of epistemic incompleteness gambling to align with unrevealed completeness. This kind of activity works psychologically because if your heuristics are bad, well, it's your fault. If the opposite were true, your failure of heuristics could be blamed on another, which would bring every trade into the arbitration space, which in turn would create huge friction of market transaction. This allows psychosecurity to be utilized to lay claim to intentional heuristic hijacking, like pump-and-dumps and rugpulls. Your epistemic incompleteness is exposed to whoever has law-of-large-numbers advantage on influence operations.

Your individual relationship with your epistemic incompleteness is a psychologically valid function to emerge a collective price of human effort.... a sort of proofing mechanism.
This company is worth X because those who are the most willing to eat the risk of their epistemic completeness being wrong are making their risk publicly accessible

Thus, those who risk their epistemic completeness at the highest volumes also have motive and incentive to establish law-of-large-number advantage on influence operations.

So then I started thinking about alternatives to that, places where epistemic heuristics are equally wrong, no matter what intensity of risk accumulates, no matter how much profit motive organizes people, no matter if multinational corporations or individuals are the participatory forces in price discovery

And then it dawned on me: prophecy

Prophecy in certain belief regimes shares the same properties as AES: each part of the chain in a prophecy has an equal probability of appearing.

Especially if it is engineered from the start to be tau-proof (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kendall_rank_correlation_coefficient)

All epistemic heuristics AND formalized scientific methods fail against tau-proof prophesy, which means the only way to game the system is to control the prophet's inner circle. (Side channel attacks, same common vulnerabilities as AES)

Here's an example: Q

Q is an example of a symbol phenomenon that was immune to epistemic heuristics, formalized scientific method inquiry, investigative research, and red team penetration

The only people who understood what prophetic symbols would appear next were the internal team and externals who somehow synced their interpretation of spooky space with it

Not even the targets of those prophesy symbols understood what the next symbol would be and nothing they could deploy gave them any weights to leverage

Prophesy ran by humans has known psychosecurity weaknesses to exploit

Prophesy ran by non-humans... proof-of-prophesy mechanisms.... they should share the same communal protections seen under proof-of-work. The primary difference is that proof-of-prophesy is immune to law-of-large-number collusion.

If a divine story had such reproducibility, you wouldn't need an evangelist caste at all

You'd have phenomenon you'd see in Orthodox Christianity, where instead of consistent and authoritative mouthpieces of the divine, you have a messenger who, for a time, can interpret a few sequential symbols

Collusive forces to control who is identified as messenger will obviously come to the fore, and again, I point to the Q event

They can't predict the next prophesy symbol, so instead, they add narrative tariffs to all future symbols in the form of censorship and cyber mob intimidation

But therein lies a paradox from the point of economics: all prophesy engines will always generate symbols that will be tariffed to near zero prices REGARDLESS of any future symbol market development

Prophesy engines will be outside of price discovery mechanics due to these narrative mercantilist reactions

This is a guaranteed promise.

Any libertarian who knows the hard math behind economic choice knows exactly where I'm going next

Prophesy engines can become indirect extractive machines that can be used to short the mercantilizing power.

Price controls redirect price discovery to unpredictable sectors. In narrative and influence operations, unpredictable sectors are dealt with via narrative QRF elements teams (fact checkers, journalists, algos, machine learning teams, etc.)... but some sectors are volatile even if a narrative QRF element gets around to it.

Prophesy engines can be used to weigh what sector the price discovery goes to, which means order of operation can be established for battle rhythm.

[HyperCrowd]

Here's an example of a psychosecurity breakdown of a person