Bug Report: GitHub Repository Search with stars<${stars_num} Query #143726
Replies: 1 comment
-
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Select Topic Area
Bug
Body
In the GitHub repository search, I encountered an issue with the query
q: stars<${stars_num}
. When stars_num is greater than 2200, the search results only include repositories with up to 2.2k stars, even if the actual specified stars_num is higher. However, when stars_num is less than 2200, the search works as expected, returning repositories with stars below the specified number.For example:
q: stars<2200
returns repositories correctly, showing results with star counts below 2200.q: stars<2500
still limits results to repositories with a maximum of 2.2k stars, which appears incorrect.Interestingly, the query
q: stars>${stars_num}
works correctly regardless of the stars_num value, returning repositories with stars above the specified count as expected.Could you please investigate and resolve this issue? In addition to affecting the page, it also affects the API
This is the correct result showing the stars filter working as expected.
This is the incorrect result where stars filter is not working properly with the 'q: stars<${stars_num}' query.
This is another correct result showing stars filter working as expected with the proper query.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions