Improving Code Ownership: GitHub Account Types for Developers and Non-Developers #145018
Replies: 1 comment
-
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Body
As GitHub becomes increasingly essential for both developers and businesses, facilitating code exchanges between entities, the platform has to continue evolving for everyone - not just devs. The amount of information displayed is still primarily for developers in th current context where more and more individuals and businesses wish to fully own their code while contracting development services - and on their own, not asking access but giving them. It becomes a necessity to include them in a new account type.
The Issue
In today's context, it makes less and less sense for developers to retain ownership of the code they develop for clients. Instead, individuals or businesses commissioning the development must maintain ownership of their repositories, including their history, from start to finish. So non-technical people must create their own account to give access to devs, right?
However, GitHub's current interface and account setup are heavily developer-centric, which creates barriers for non-technical individuals or businesses. These users often lack the technical knowledge required to confidently manage repositories, assign access, or navigate GitHub's developer-focused terminology and features. We must display fewer stuff for them!
Proposed Solution
Introduce two distinct account types on GitHub:
Developer Account:
Non-Developer Account (Businesses/Individuals):
Why This Matters?
This feature would completely reassure non-technical people on ownership and will:
Call to Action
GitHub can support the growth of the development industry and make it more accessible to non-technical users. I even believe this shift aligns with GitHub's mission of being the platform for everyone to build software. So let's discuss it and maybe make it happen!
🆙Now, would you support this feature?🆙
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions