-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 714
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Different licence and copyright infomation for different data providers #1699
Comments
I'm not entirely sure how you imagine this works license-wise. OSM data is under ODbL and as a share-alike license, it would 'contaminate' any additional data when they are imported together in Nominatim. So the license of the database is ODbL globally (including the obligation to make your mixed database available publicly). If your extra data is not ODbL-compatible then you're better off keeping it in a separate database and mixing results from the two Nominatim instances in the webserver. I could see a use-case where you need to add additional attribution information. There are placeholder in Nomiantim for external house number data (the currently empty If you convert your external data into OSM format and import that, then you could add additional attribution information simply as a tag to each object. Import with the If it's done in a configurable and well-documented way, I might accept a pull request. |
Thank you so much! We will discuss and define the usage of the customized data and licence according to your advice, and then submit our change. |
Dear Sarah, Regarding the Nominatim change, I would like to ask your opinion on the following steps:
We will guarantee to keep the default configuration of the original Nominatim source and will always respect current OSM licence structure for the OSM data. Thanks a lot for your correction and advice in advance! |
Dear @lonvia, |
This can now be done using customized API output as per #3515. |
Hello,
As we need to use data from different sources, we would like to link the corresponding licence and copyright information with the place in the database. Meanwhile, we will keep the original openstreetmap licence for the original data as default. We are implementing this feature now. I am wondering if we can ask for a 'Pull request' regarding this customization?
Thanks a lot for your help!
Joy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: