Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate Get/Set High/Low Stop functions in Joint. #1108

Closed
osrf-migration opened this issue Mar 14, 2014 · 6 comments
Closed

Deprecate Get/Set High/Low Stop functions in Joint. #1108

osrf-migration opened this issue Mar 14, 2014 · 6 comments
Labels
all bug Something isn't working major physics

Comments

@osrf-migration
Copy link

Original report (archived issue) by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).


The functions mentioned in the title have been soft-deprecated. The comments say they are deprecated, but they have not been properly marked as deprecated.

@osrf-migration
Copy link
Author

Original comment by Steve Peters (Bitbucket: Steven Peters, GitHub: scpeters).


The comments aren't telling the whole story. They say GetUpperLimit and GetLowerLimit should be used instead. I think that is probably a better name for the functions, since it's nice to have the same number of letters in parter function names, so they're easier to read on adjacent lines.

The High/Low stop functions aren't ready to be deprecated yet, though since they are virtual, while the Upper/Lower Limit functions exist only in Joint. There is no BulletHingeJoint::SetUpperLimit for example.

This would improve the function names in the API, but it will take some extra work before they can be deprecated.

@osrf-migration
Copy link
Author

Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).


  • set version to "all"

@osrf-migration
Copy link
Author

Original comment by Louise Poubel (Bitbucket: chapulina, GitHub: chapulina).


  • set assignee_account_id to "557058:6ff86fcb-b7ab-44a5-b8a6-f6d9cae8b6e8"
  • set assignee to "chapulina (Bitbucket: chapulina, GitHub: chapulina)"

@osrf-migration
Copy link
Author

Original comment by Louise Poubel (Bitbucket: chapulina, GitHub: chapulina).


pull request #2568

@osrf-migration
Copy link
Author

Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).


  • changed state from "new" to "resolved"

Resolved in pull request #2568

@osrf-migration
Copy link
Author

Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).


  • changed state from "resolved" to "closed"

@osrf-migration osrf-migration added major physics bug Something isn't working all labels Apr 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
all bug Something isn't working major physics
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant