-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 486
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Offer more alignment options #1242
Comments
Original comment by Louise Poubel (Bitbucket: chapulina, GitHub: chapulina). Right now we offer 3 alignment options per axis. If we're aligning to 1st selected:
We could add a button which, if checked, changes the behavior of min and max to:
Not sure what would be written / pictured on that button though. |
Original comment by William Woodall (Bitbucket: William Woodall, GitHub: wjwwood). When I mentioned the button I was thinking of this button from Solidworks' mate system: http://blogs.solidworks.com/tech/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/MateAlignment.png I think their iconography makes sense there, and it does what you've described (I think). One potential difference is that in Solidworks they actually rotate the part along a coplanar axis so that it's still the same two faces which are being snapped together, just rotated so that the rest of the object projects one way or the other. |
Original comment by Louise Poubel (Bitbucket: chapulina, GitHub: chapulina). Yeah, the icons are really clear there. You're right about the difference, my suggestion doesn't involve rotating a part. Rotating things to face each other in the realm of Gazebo is closer to "snap" than "align" right now. |
Original comment by Steffi Paepcke (Bitbucket: spaepcke). That looks awesome! I definitely support adding that. |
Original comment by Steffi Paepcke (Bitbucket: spaepcke). @chapulina Does this Solidworks explanation pertain to our version, or is it different? http://help.solidworks.com/2013/English/SolidWorks/sldworks/c_Mate_Alignment_SWassy.htm If so, perhaps a similar icon would be good. |
Original comment by Louise Poubel (Bitbucket: chapulina, GitHub: chapulina). Not really. We're not handling faces and normals here. Instead, we're getting the rightmost point of one model and bringing it to the rightmost / leftmost point of another and so on. Which doesn't involve rotating the models. Does that make sense? |
Original comment by Steve Peters (Bitbucket: Steven Peters, GitHub: scpeters). Now that pull request #2040 has been merged, what remains to be done? |
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).
|
Original report (archived issue) by Steffi Paepcke (Bitbucket: spaepcke).
In snap/align user study, when aligning wheel to chassis, the wheel aligned on the inside of the chassis, rather than on the outside. We should offer more alignment options.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: