-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 498
Joint::GetAngle returns Angle, which is confusing for non-angular joints #553
Comments
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).
Until after June, 2013. |
Original comment by Steve Peters (Bitbucket: Steven Peters, GitHub: scpeters). Maybe we could deprecate |
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig). Sounds good. |
Original comment by Steve Peters (Bitbucket: Steven Peters, GitHub: scpeters). It'll take a bit more work than I thought because we also use |
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).
|
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).
|
Original comment by Louise Poubel (Bitbucket: chapulina, GitHub: chapulina). I'm planning on tackling this while migrating to ignition math. The plan:
|
Original comment by Louise Poubel (Bitbucket: chapulina, GitHub: chapulina). Implemented numbers 1 and 2 in pull request #2568. I believe we can add number 3 later without breaking ABI/API. |
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).
Resolved in pull request #2568 |
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).
|
Original report (archived issue) by John Hsu (Bitbucket: hsu, GitHub: hsu).
Typical usage right now expects user to do:
even for prismatic joints, or joints with non-angular positions. This is potentially confusing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: