Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Improve console output for files scan command #32085

Closed
mmattel opened this issue Jul 18, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #32089
Closed

[Feature Request] Improve console output for files scan command #32085

mmattel opened this issue Jul 18, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #32089

Comments

@mmattel
Copy link
Contributor

mmattel commented Jul 18, 2018

10.0.9

Running sudo -uwww-data ./occ files:scan --path="user_id/files/mount_point"

Scanning files for 1 users
Starting scan for user 1 out of 1 (user_id)

+---------+-------+----------+
| Folders | Files | Elapsed  |
+---------+-------+----------+
| 519     | 19794 | 00:02:34 |
+---------+-------+----------+

Feature Request
Adding a Items per second column (folders + files / used seconds)

+---------+-------+----------+------------------+
| Folders | Files | Elapsed  | Items per second |
+---------+-------+----------+------------------+
| 519     | 19794 | 00:02:34 |        260       |
+---------+-------+----------+------------------+

Benefit:
Performance overview

@ownclouders
Copy link
Contributor

GitMate.io thinks the contributor most likely able to help you is @PVince81.

Possibly related issues are #8569 (Feature requests), #12530 (Feature Request), #29635 (Add basic tests for files:scan command), #6636 (Feature request: Copy file/folder), and #11663 (Feature Request: allow sharing of multiple files/folders).

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jul 30, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants