Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

run federation acceptance tests against more different server versions #34500

Closed
individual-it opened this issue Feb 15, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Comments

@individual-it
Copy link
Member

individual-it commented Feb 15, 2019

Currently we run stable10-QA tarball as federated server that only tests that the current PR works correctly with the code base of yesterday. To make sure that the current PR also works correctly with released versions of federation sharing we should:

  1. run the federation server from the current PR
  2. run the federation server from all currently supported and released tarballs (currently 10.0.10 & 10.1.0)

@PVince81 @davitol @phil-davis comments? priority?

@ownclouders
Copy link
Contributor

GitMate.io thinks the contributor most likely able to help you is @phil-davis.

Possibly related issues are #33506 (Adding more federation acceptance tests), #31579 (test), #22485 (test), #22492 (test), and #32053 (Federation acceptance tests should really have different servers).

@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks GitMate! If I help with this then I will explode the test matrix so we new the whole Earth for computing test results. But the Earth is currently computing the answer to "the meaning of life, the universe and everything" ;)

@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor

I added this to the sprint. It would be great to know that federated sharing works between the latest code and older serves. That will add confidence that as people upgrade individual servers in their "federated cloud" that their federated shares will keep working OK.

@individual-it
Copy link
Member Author

fixed by #36047

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants