-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
impg
is unhappy with my PAF
#10
Comments
What kind of works:
However, in the resulting PAF, the self-mapping is reported (chm13#0#tig00000001 vs chm13#0#tig00000001), although I set |
It is 'intended'. I removed this "feature", but then added it back because it makes one-liner commands easier. I agree that it should be managed better in the future. |
Still I am wondering what is the issue with my PAF in the first comment? |
Here is the file @AndreaGuarracino. validate_paf.py.zip
So I assume |
The PAF works. The issue was likely due to a too old index. #16 helps in preventing this confusion. |
Here is how I generated the PAF:
The input LPA is from the pggb repository.
Here is what's going wrong:
Any ideas? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: