Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discrepancy in images names across CSV files #193

Open
TiernonRR opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Discrepancy in images names across CSV files #193

TiernonRR opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@TiernonRR
Copy link

I am trying to use the multiview loss for a non-mirrorred setup. I have two views and I have organized my data directory in the way explained in the documentation. The index for each csv is the relative path to the respective labeled view. I am unable to run the training script, however, as I recieve the following error in the datasets.py script: ImportError: Discrepancy in images names across CSV files! index:0, image frame names:['labeled-data/151618_view0/frame_0000.png', 'labeled-data/151618_view1/frame_0000.png']. I have cross-examined with the documenatation and this naming schema seems consistent with what is required. Please let me know if you require further information. Thank you!

@TiernonRR TiernonRR changed the title Discrepancy in images names across CSV files! Discrepancy in images names across CSV files Aug 27, 2024
@themattinthehatt
Copy link
Collaborator

@TiernonRR I took a look at the code here and it looks like the issue is the code is expecting the name to be of the form img0000.png instead of frame_0000.png. This is a bit silly, and should work out of the box for any naming scheme that is consistent, so I can look into fixing this. However, I'm about half an hour from going on vacation for the rest of the week, so unfortunately I won't be able to get to this soon. So maybe try renaming to the imgXXXX.png scheme and see if that works for you.

@TiernonRR
Copy link
Author

TiernonRR commented Aug 27, 2024

That did the trick. Thank you! I can leave this open if you plan to return to the naming scheme?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants