You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
PaNOSC will start to register services in the EOSC very soon and as a part of the process a Service Provider must be assigned.
It is not clear what is the best strategy for this. Ideally PaNOSC would have a consistent approach.
Options are:
The RI that is providing the service
PaNOSC and/or ExPaNDS
LENS and/or LEAPS
A new PaN Community body
As of today it is not clear what are the requirements to be listed "Service Provider" and whether that imposes some obligations/constraints via SLA or similar. It looks like the "Service Provider" does not need to be a legal entity, however it may be positive to have a "Service Provider" more permanent than just PaNOSC and ExPaNDS.
This topic is to be discussed and agreed at PMC level.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
PaNOSC will start to register services in the EOSC very soon and as a part of the process a Service Provider must be assigned.
It is not clear what is the best strategy for this. Ideally PaNOSC would have a consistent approach.
Options are:
As of today it is not clear what are the requirements to be listed "Service Provider" and whether that imposes some obligations/constraints via SLA or similar. It looks like the "Service Provider" does not need to be a legal entity, however it may be positive to have a "Service Provider" more permanent than just PaNOSC and ExPaNDS.
This topic is to be discussed and agreed at PMC level.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: