-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
node-gyp fails to build @parcel/watcher on node:18 image but succeeds with node:18-bullseye #9262
Comments
Hey guys! We are seeing a similar issue on our prod deployment on M1 machines, it broke 2 days ago but was working before that. |
Hello, on mac too, same error, does somoene on linux or windows have this issues ? |
We had a same issue since few days ago in our gitlab pipelines running on arm cpus. We reverted from |
I'm seeing the same "binding.gyp not found" on both Windows 10 with Python 3.12 and OSX 12.6.5 with Python 3.10. I've tried both node.js 18 and 16, maybe I'll try a slightly older minor version of node.js. Someone on stackoverflow.com mentioned that node.js 17 worked, but that's not LTS. node-gyp is painful. |
try use |
gentify's issue means it wont do any |
🐛 bug report
I'm using NX which has a dependency on parcel and when building my image I got a node-gyp failure. Following along with this isssue I changed the image to bullseye and boom, it works. Not really sure why though.
🎛 Configuration (.babelrc, package.json, cli command)
package.json
Dockerfile
🤔 Expected Behavior
Parcel should build on Node:18 image
😯 Current Behavior
From Node:18 image
💻 Code Sample
I believe with the package.json and Dockerfile you should be able to repro it on an M1 Mac.
🌍 Your Environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: