You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
Cross posted by request from: https://substrate.stackexchange.com/questions/9498/proposals-not-getting-processed-consensus-issues-on-rococo
Context:
A parachain in Rococo is missing more block slots than I would expect it to at fairly random times.
Version: Polkadot v0.9.42
Number of Collators: 3
Logging:
(Perhaps I am missing the correct trace log to see the issue?)
Perhaps most useful part of the log:
Full Log in Gist: https://gist.github.com/wilwade/f4ec02bc60a6863c0a1fed66957f8aae
Here's another more recent log: https://gist.github.com/wilwade/aa1f4ea8dace5938aa8e7a430b780eb1
Appearance: Looks like the collators are forming the candidate blocks, but the candidate blocks are not getting included in the relay chain.
Things I don't think it is:
So actual questions:
aura: [Parachain] No block for n slots
This appears to just be telling me what I already know, that no blocks were formed when we expected them to be. Is that a correct interpretation of the log? (Log is inside of https://paritytech.github.io/substrate/master/sc_consensus_slots/fn.proposing_remaining_duration.html)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: